CRRT question
Featured Replies
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Currently Reading 0
- No registered users viewing this page.
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
We have just recently purchased PrismaFlex (made by Gambro) CRRT machines to replace our prior - outdated - Prisma machines. My only experience in caring for CRRT patients has been using the M60 or M100 hemofilters. Gambro has an HF series hemofilter which can be used with their PrismaFlex machines. I know the M series of filters have charged membranes and (theoretically) remove larger molecules - like sepsis mediators - more effectively by adsorption. I have never used the HF series and don't have the experiential knowledge to know if there are advantages/disadvantages compared to the M series.
Have any of you used both types of hemofilter? I've seen patients improve hemodynamically within the first hour or two of being on an M100 filter. I'd hate for us to lose that by choosing the HF series as we start using our new machines. I'd love to hear some bedside observations and be able to relay them as we make our own decisions (with the nephrologists, of course).
Thanks!