Arterial Line Accuracy - help!
Featured Replies
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Currently Reading 0
- No registered users viewing this page.
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
Hi Everyone,
I come from an ICU that used arterial lines frequently and I considered myself competent and knowledgable on them. I have encountered a new practice on my traveling assignment and I need advice and further arterial line insight from you all.
While it was considered common knowledge at my old ICU that art lines must remain at a fixed point (heart level is where we put them) in order to be consistent and accurate, they do NOT do that on this unit. They actually tape the transducer (which in this set up is only about 6 inches from the insertion site) to the patient's arm. I've always had a set up where the tranducer was about 2 feet from the insertion site and I would fix it at heart level to the bed or to a standing pole in the room.
It was considered common knowledge about my unit that if the tranducer was too low then it was an inaccurately high reading and it was was too high it was an inaccurately low reading.
I've checked the protocol and it says NOTHING about setting the transducer to a fixed point.
When checking for a cuff pressure correlation the MAPS often do correlate fairly well, even with the tranducer lying in the patient's lap. But the systolics vary and I just can't get used to this. I had a patient last night whose BP was apparently higher than his set parameters when he arm was on the bed but when I raised his arm to heart level MAGICALLY he was within parameters! But apparently, the arm lying wherever it may lie is the set up that they use.
What am I missing here? This is a MAJOR teaching hospital and my unit is full of experienced ICU nurses.