So I know that ATI is just a way of life for a lot of nursing schools and as I am about to finish my first year of my ADN program I get it. I passed my first two ATI tests (Fundamentals and Mental Health) first time around so I'm not "complaining" because I couldn't pass.
However, while I was studying for the fundamental's test I took the practice tests on the site and I realized that some of the information is really really backwards/old. For the rationales for questions about CPR they use ABC (airway, breathes, compression) while, correct me if I'm wrong, its been changed by the American Heart Association to CAB (compressions, airway, breathes) for some time now. In addition, we were told this content was just recently updated and that was why they changed the benchmark number required to pass. Whenever discrepancies are brought to our professors they state that 1. they cannot see the test content because it would jeopardize the testing validity and 2. that we need to get "used" to questions having answers different that are taught in our classes/lectures because the NCLEX is written by nurses across the country.
This is frustrating to me because I feel as though this is not an accurate analogy. Yes, test questions on the NCLEX are written by nurses across the country so when we learn a certain skill the order we learned it in might be slightly different, or lab values might be slightly different in their normal ranges. I get that I need to understand the concepts I am taught so that I can apply them no matter who writes the test and use critical thinking. I understand all this, but testing students on CPR incorrectly seems categorically different. I feel like professors are turning a blind eye simply because it helps the programs compare themselves to other programs. It is for the school's benefit, not the students; we are just stuck with the ATI bill.
Also, how the heck can our professors teach us the content that will be on the tests if they don't know what we are being tested on? If they trust the ATI content so well, why don't they use the ATI books? and not separate textbooks? I have come to the conclusion that I have to learn two ways: 1. the correct content my professors teach me and 2. the incorrect content ATI gives us. I feel like the students in my class who are failing by 1% below the benchmark are being denied the 5% of their grade unfairly. I just deem myself fortunate for being able to catch the discrepancies. How can nursing programs decide if the ATI program/product is being successful if they cannot view the test after it is taken? To me it seems like nursing programs won't be able to adequately assess its school's progress as it uses the ATI product.
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
So I know that ATI is just a way of life for a lot of nursing schools and as I am about to finish my first year of my ADN program I get it. I passed my first two ATI tests (Fundamentals and Mental Health) first time around so I'm not "complaining" because I couldn't pass.
However, while I was studying for the fundamental's test I took the practice tests on the site and I realized that some of the information is really really backwards/old. For the rationales for questions about CPR they use ABC (airway, breathes, compression) while, correct me if I'm wrong, its been changed by the American Heart Association to CAB (compressions, airway, breathes) for some time now. In addition, we were told this content was just recently updated and that was why they changed the benchmark number required to pass. Whenever discrepancies are brought to our professors they state that 1. they cannot see the test content because it would jeopardize the testing validity and 2. that we need to get "used" to questions having answers different that are taught in our classes/lectures because the NCLEX is written by nurses across the country.
This is frustrating to me because I feel as though this is not an accurate analogy. Yes, test questions on the NCLEX are written by nurses across the country so when we learn a certain skill the order we learned it in might be slightly different, or lab values might be slightly different in their normal ranges. I get that I need to understand the concepts I am taught so that I can apply them no matter who writes the test and use critical thinking. I understand all this, but testing students on CPR incorrectly seems categorically different. I feel like professors are turning a blind eye simply because it helps the programs compare themselves to other programs. It is for the school's benefit, not the students; we are just stuck with the ATI bill.
Also, how the heck can our professors teach us the content that will be on the tests if they don't know what we are being tested on? If they trust the ATI content so well, why don't they use the ATI books? and not separate textbooks? I have come to the conclusion that I have to learn two ways: 1. the correct content my professors teach me and 2. the incorrect content ATI gives us. I feel like the students in my class who are failing by 1% below the benchmark are being denied the 5% of their grade unfairly. I just deem myself fortunate for being able to catch the discrepancies. How can nursing programs decide if the ATI program/product is being successful if they cannot view the test after it is taken? To me it seems like nursing programs won't be able to adequately assess its school's progress as it uses the ATI product.