Grassroots Network Message 106019 2nd ACTION ALERT! Patients' Bill of Rights
Dear Friends,
This is another CALL TO ACTION from Citizens for Midwifery!
The Patients' Bill of Rights was passed by the Senate late Friday 6/29, and now will be debated in the House. Therefore, it is time to WRITE LETTERS to your Representatives in Congress. And if you haven't yet written to your Senators, it is not too late - the bill will be amended in the House, and if passed, the two different versions will go to a conference committee; both Senators and Representatives will be on that conference committee which will
further amend the bill.
This opportunity to bring the Midwives Model of Care to the attention of our elected officials in Washington continues! Again, please note that this action has been initiated by Citizens for Midwifery, not by any midwifery organization(s).
And Pam Maurath will be going to Washington on THIS MONDAY, July 2, and will deliver copies of any letters you have faxed or e-mailed to her by the end of Sunday, July 1. But even if you can't make that deadline, do go ahead and FAX or EMAIL to your members of Congress TODAY!
You can use the same information as in GNM 106018. You can even use the same letter you already sent to your Senators, with a cover note to your Representative.
Below is the important information from GNM message 106018. (This time we are making sure that all url's, etc., are actually in the text!) Also, the CfM website which was temporarily down, is now "up" again.
From GNM 106018 (with a few changes since the bill has been passed by the Senate and is now going to the House):
Citizens for Midwifery has heard from many people who have been frustrated to discover that their HMO plans do not pay for cost-effective midwife-attended out-of-hospital birth. At this time, the Patient's Bill of Rights, a consumer protection bill (at least in theory), does not mention or provide for any kind of midwifery care under HMOs. Let's let our Senators and Representatives in Washington know what WE want! Any version of the bill that
is passed should include language that assures access to midwifery care in all settings, in other words, says that women in HMOs should not be limited to obstetricians for maternity care, but should have the option of choosing a midwife. The addition of just a few words in one part of the bill would
address this deficiency:
______________
S.1256
SEC. XX104. ACCESS TO SPECIALTY CARE.
(a) OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL CARE-
(1) IN GENERAL- If a group health plan, or a health insurance issuer in connection with the provision of health insurance coverage, requires or provides for a participant, beneficiary, or enrollee to designate a participating primary care provider--
(A) the plan or issuer shall permit such an individual who is a
female to designate a participating physician who specializes in obstetrics and gynecology as the individual's primary care provider OR A NATIONALLY-CERTIFIED AND STATE-REGULATED MIDWIFE, AS THE INDIVIDUAL'S MATERNITY CARE PROVIDER; and ...
You can read the entire bill at: http://www.senate.gov/~daschle/issues/index.html>> click on "health care" (doctor icon on lower right) and look for "read the text...".
_______________
While the addition of these words to the bill would not mean that CPMs and licensed midwives would automatically be included in HMOs and other insurance policies, leaving them out (the present wording) would certainly give HMOs, etc., good reason not to include these providers in their policies.
The suggested language does not include unregulated midwives, even if they are apparently legal, because HMOs and other insurance plans try to minimize their legal vulnerability by including only providers that are credentialed and government-regulated. However, even with this limitation, the inclusion
of midwifery services (in all settings) would be a huge step forward. No matter what state you live in, write to your Senator and Congressperson TODAY to tell them you want HMOs to include the choice of midwifery care in all settings.
The reality is that our suggested change probably will not be included -- it will be a real coup if we even get even one minute of attention in the midst of all the high-powered lobbyists. And even if it is passed by Congress, the bill is likely to be vetoed by President Bush. However, this opportunity to communicate to Congress about midwifery should not be passed up! Also, Pam
Maurath will be going to Washington in a few days and can deliver directly to Sen. Daschle's office copies of your letters and e-mails along with additional midwifery information. The more letters, faxes and e-mails there are, the more Sen. Daschle will realize that this is an important issue to consumers. In addition, Pam has volunteered to stuff all the Senate mailboxes with midwifery information including the Midwives Model of Care
brochure.
In the next reply is the continuation of the original text and what and how to do it. Please do it tonight or Today:p
Grassroots Network Message 106019 2nd ACTION ALERT! Patients' Bill of Rights
Dear Friends,
This is another CALL TO ACTION from Citizens for Midwifery!
The Patients' Bill of Rights was passed by the Senate late Friday 6/29, and now will be debated in the House. Therefore, it is time to WRITE LETTERS to your Representatives in Congress. And if you haven't yet written to your Senators, it is not too late - the bill will be amended in the House, and if passed, the two different versions will go to a conference committee; both Senators and Representatives will be on that conference committee which will
further amend the bill.
This opportunity to bring the Midwives Model of Care to the attention of our elected officials in Washington continues! Again, please note that this action has been initiated by Citizens for Midwifery, not by any midwifery organization(s).
And Pam Maurath will be going to Washington on THIS MONDAY, July 2, and will deliver copies of any letters you have faxed or e-mailed to her by the end of Sunday, July 1. But even if you can't make that deadline, do go ahead and FAX or EMAIL to your members of Congress TODAY!
You can use the same information as in GNM 106018. You can even use the same letter you already sent to your Senators, with a cover note to your Representative.
Below is the important information from GNM message 106018. (This time we are making sure that all url's, etc., are actually in the text!) Also, the CfM website which was temporarily down, is now "up" again.
From GNM 106018 (with a few changes since the bill has been passed by the Senate and is now going to the House):
Citizens for Midwifery has heard from many people who have been frustrated to discover that their HMO plans do not pay for cost-effective midwife-attended out-of-hospital birth. At this time, the Patient's Bill of Rights, a consumer protection bill (at least in theory), does not mention or provide for any kind of midwifery care under HMOs. Let's let our Senators and Representatives in Washington know what WE want! Any version of the bill that
is passed should include language that assures access to midwifery care in all settings, in other words, says that women in HMOs should not be limited to obstetricians for maternity care, but should have the option of choosing a midwife. The addition of just a few words in one part of the bill would
address this deficiency:
______________
S.1256
SEC. XX104. ACCESS TO SPECIALTY CARE.
(a) OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL CARE-
(1) IN GENERAL- If a group health plan, or a health insurance issuer in connection with the provision of health insurance coverage, requires or provides for a participant, beneficiary, or enrollee to designate a participating primary care provider--
(A) the plan or issuer shall permit such an individual who is a
female to designate a participating physician who specializes in obstetrics and gynecology as the individual's primary care provider OR A NATIONALLY-CERTIFIED AND STATE-REGULATED MIDWIFE, AS THE INDIVIDUAL'S MATERNITY CARE PROVIDER; and ...
You can read the entire bill at: http://www.senate.gov/~daschle/issues/index.html>> click on "health care" (doctor icon on lower right) and look for "read the text...".
_______________
While the addition of these words to the bill would not mean that CPMs and licensed midwives would automatically be included in HMOs and other insurance policies, leaving them out (the present wording) would certainly give HMOs, etc., good reason not to include these providers in their policies.
The suggested language does not include unregulated midwives, even if they are apparently legal, because HMOs and other insurance plans try to minimize their legal vulnerability by including only providers that are credentialed and government-regulated. However, even with this limitation, the inclusion
of midwifery services (in all settings) would be a huge step forward. No matter what state you live in, write to your Senator and Congressperson TODAY to tell them you want HMOs to include the choice of midwifery care in all settings.
The reality is that our suggested change probably will not be included -- it will be a real coup if we even get even one minute of attention in the midst of all the high-powered lobbyists. And even if it is passed by Congress, the bill is likely to be vetoed by President Bush. However, this opportunity to communicate to Congress about midwifery should not be passed up! Also, Pam
Maurath will be going to Washington in a few days and can deliver directly to Sen. Daschle's office copies of your letters and e-mails along with additional midwifery information. The more letters, faxes and e-mails there are, the more Sen. Daschle will realize that this is an important issue to consumers. In addition, Pam has volunteered to stuff all the Senate mailboxes with midwifery information including the Midwives Model of Care
brochure.
In the next reply is the continuation of the original text and what and how to do it. Please do it tonight or Today:p