So I'm doing the NCSBN $70 for 5 weeks. I came across this statement in the poison control module:
before the body absorbs poison, remove it, (either through vomiting or gastric lavage) or neutralize it (using activated charcoal, for example)
Just want to clarify, we DO NOT give Ipecac anymore to induce vomiting correct?
Also... if anyone is planning to buy the NCSBN learning extensions, please save your $. Rationales are poorly constructed. They also don't have a lot of information on each subject, also very vague and misleading. For example:
The care provider has the legal obligation to obtain informed consent for medical treatment, but the nurse should confirm consent and answer the client's questions.
I don't think nurses are allowed to answer the client's questions about the procedure. All questions and clarifications should be directed to either the physician or the surgeon.
Nurses are only there to witness the informed consent.
Saunders would be a much better tool. I regret buying the 5 weeks instead of 3 weeks to test it out. I wish I could get a refund somehow
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
So I'm doing the NCSBN $70 for 5 weeks. I came across this statement in the poison control module:
Just want to clarify, we DO NOT give Ipecac anymore to induce vomiting correct?
Also... if anyone is planning to buy the NCSBN learning extensions, please save your $. Rationales are poorly constructed. They also don't have a lot of information on each subject, also very vague and misleading. For example:
I don't think nurses are allowed to answer the client's questions about the procedure. All questions and clarifications should be directed to either the physician or the surgeon.
Nurses are only there to witness the informed consent.
Saunders would be a much better tool. I regret buying the 5 weeks instead of 3 weeks to test it out. I wish I could get a refund somehow