Just wanted everyone's opinion on this topic. I am told that the AMA has/is making plans to increase the number of graduating physicians training in primary care specialties by the thousands within the very near future. Over the past decade a number of new medical schools have opened across the country and there are plans for many more (both MD and DO), in 2015 the ACGME is taking over all osteopathic residencies (thus adding in the ever expanding pool of DO graduates who historically stick to primary care), and apparently they are even alleviating restrictions to international MDs trying to do primary care residency in the states. Though the number of residency spots has been pretty much capped at a stagnant number for the past 15-20 years, the AMA is now pushing for Congress to increase GME funding to allow for an increasing pool of residency/fellowship trained physicians in the primary care setting. My concern is that should Congress help facilitate this (highly likely if not inevitable due to the physician shortage compounded by baby boomer population + 30 million more individuals insured under the ACA within the next 5 years) then before long there will no longer be a physician shortage (if not physician excess) and at that point where does that leave us NP's in a pursuit for autonomous practice rights...Is there anything the AANP can do to stop Congress from funding these extra residency programs..i.e. show them that the money would be better spent expanding NPs rather then pouring into increasing physicians who require the extra schooling/residency/fellowship training? Thanks..
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Just wanted everyone's opinion on this topic. I am told that the AMA has/is making plans to increase the number of graduating physicians training in primary care specialties by the thousands within the very near future. Over the past decade a number of new medical schools have opened across the country and there are plans for many more (both MD and DO), in 2015 the ACGME is taking over all osteopathic residencies (thus adding in the ever expanding pool of DO graduates who historically stick to primary care), and apparently they are even alleviating restrictions to international MDs trying to do primary care residency in the states. Though the number of residency spots has been pretty much capped at a stagnant number for the past 15-20 years, the AMA is now pushing for Congress to increase GME funding to allow for an increasing pool of residency/fellowship trained physicians in the primary care setting. My concern is that should Congress help facilitate this (highly likely if not inevitable due to the physician shortage compounded by baby boomer population + 30 million more individuals insured under the ACA within the next 5 years) then before long there will no longer be a physician shortage (if not physician excess) and at that point where does that leave us NP's in a pursuit for autonomous practice rights...Is there anything the AANP can do to stop Congress from funding these extra residency programs..i.e. show them that the money would be better spent expanding NPs rather then pouring into increasing physicians who require the extra schooling/residency/fellowship training? Thanks..