Published
Something to understand what nurses think about re the Current News and their opinions!
2 hours ago, toomuchbaloney said:Anthony Fauci is up against more than a virus
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2022/01/27/fauci-pandemic-threats/
I thought this was a nice perspective to lean up against Beerman's increasing concern about the viral origins and Fauci's motives.
So what do we do about propaganda and lies flooding media outlets?
I think about your question every day but can't come up with an answer. I just say to myself THANK YOU JESUS for allowing me to live in the best of times (probably:) and hopefully will be dead before the snow catches fire.
51 minutes ago, subee said:I think about your question every day but can't come up with an answer. I just say to myself THANK YOU JESUS for allowing me to live in the best of times (probably:) and hopefully will be dead before the snow catches fire.
We aren't the only Americans concerned about propaganda.
Grifters gotta grift...
Books, speeches, hats for sale: Post-presidency, the Trumps try to make money the pre-presidency way
QuoteO’Brien and others also noted that Trump saw throughout his presidency that supporters would give to him, even if they barely had the money, and gave more than $70 million to a fund intended to help him overturn the election.
On 1/28/2022 at 1:02 PM, toomuchbaloney said:Grifters gotta grift...
Books, speeches, hats for sale: Post-presidency, the Trumps try to make money the pre-presidency way
Nothing wrong with this. I hate that there are people that pay money for this stuff, but when there's a demand making money is the American way. Most ex-presidents have benefited financially post-presidency on their fame. Mrs. Obama with her books, podcasts and public appearances appears to be doing very well.
Some like Chelsea Clinton have worked for their pay, including writing a book with her mother, and with a net worth in the millions clearly she too has benefited from her connections.
1 hour ago, Tweety said:Nothing wrong with this. I hate that there are people that pay money for this stuff, but when there's a demand making money is the American way. Most ex-presidents have benefited financially post-presidency on their fame. Mrs. Obama with her books, podcasts and public appearances appears to be doing very well.
Some like Chelsea Clinton have worked for their pay, including writing a book with her mother, and with a net worth in the millions clearly she too has benefited from her connections.
Some people capitalize on opportunity developed by their talents and influence and some people grift. The Trump's are grifters.
3 hours ago, Tweety said:Nothing wrong with this. I hate that there are people that pay money for this stuff, but when there's a demand making money is the American way. Most ex-presidents have benefited financially post-presidency on their fame. Mrs. Obama with her books, podcasts and public appearances appears to be doing very well.
Some like Chelsea Clinton have worked for their pay, including writing a book with her mother, and with a net worth in the millions clearly she too has benefited from her connections.
There is no comparison between Chelsea Clinton and Michelle Obama writing their books and the Trumps selling their cheap crap manufactured in China.
38 minutes ago, subee said:There is no comparison between Chelsea Clinton and Michelle Obama writing their books and the Trumps selling their cheap crap manufactured in China.
Yes there is. They are in legal and profitable business enterprises and they are profiting on their family member's ex-Presidency. That's the comparison I'm making, not on the quality of the content.
2 hours ago, toomuchbaloney said:Some people capitalize on opportunity developed by their talents and influence and some people grift. The Trump's are grifters.
You are entitled to your opinion. Sounds to me like they know what they are doing and capitalizing on an opportunity.
QuoteYears after shuttering businesses selling Trump steaks, Trump vodka and Trump mattresses, the Trumps have returned to unconventional direct-to-consumer appeals that trade on his continued popularity among a devoted base to the tune of millions of dollars in receipts. Even as some of his traditional businesses have struggled after a polarizing presidency, Trump and his family have been launching a whole set designed to target his die-hard followers.
59 minutes ago, subee said:There is no comparison between Chelsea Clinton and Michelle Obama writing their books and the Trumps selling their cheap crap manufactured in China.
3 hours ago, toomuchbaloney said:Some people capitalize on opportunity developed by their talents and influence and some people grift. The Trump's are grifters.
They sell their share of crap, too.
https://www.businessinsider.com/barack-obama-michelle-obama-net-worth-2018-7
Barrack charges a pretty steep speaking fee. One of his topics is how to be a successful entrepreneur. I don't see much evidence that he is really that talented or knowledgable in that area. Sounds grifter-like to me.
But, they are making the most of the opportunity in front of them. Good for them.
16 minutes ago, Beerman said:
They sell their share of crap, too.
"She's also sold 25 different items of merchandise related to the book, including mugs that retail for $20 and candles that retail for $35."
https://www.businessinsider.com/barack-obama-michelle-obama-net-worth-2018-7
Barrack charges a pretty steep speaking fee. One of his topics is how to be a successful entrepreneur. I don't see much evidence that he is really that talented or knowledgable in that area. Sounds grifter-like to me.
But, they are making the most of the opportunity in front of them. Good for them.
Clearly, lots of conservative Americans are unable to discern conmen from competent leaders, the Trump's are proof of that. There's more evidence that the grifters are running the show in Trumplandia...but the Trump family is pretty obviously skilled in the swindle.
Guest
0 Posts
Anthony Fauci is up against more than a virus
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2022/01/27/fauci-pandemic-threats/
I thought this was a nice perspective to lean up against Beerman's increasing concern about the viral origins and Fauci's motives.
So what do we do about propaganda and lies flooding media outlets?