Published Oct 26, 2017
klone, MSN, RN
14,856 Posts
We will be needing to upgrade our EFM software in the next year or so. Currently using old-school Centricity that does not communicate with our EMR, so it's essentially stand-alone documentation. Our facility will be upgrading to a different EMR (will be making a decision in the next few months, so 18-24 months after that point). If we go with Cerner, we will just purchase the Cerner EFM software. If we go with Epic, we will have to go with a different EFM package. From what I can tell, our options are:
Obix
Tracevue (I think this is now called Intellispace)
Centricity/CPM (used to be QS maybe?)
Cerner Fetalink
PeriGen
I've used Obix, Tracevue and Centricity. Haven't used Cerner or PeriGen. Would like people's opinions on what they use, if they've used more than one type, and how they like it compared to others they've used.
Thank you!
BSNbeauty, BSN, RN
1,939 Posts
We use GE / centricity. I like it. However, we will be using epic next year.
Epic doesn't have its own EFM. So your facility will need to use a 3rd party EFM. Centricity is compatible with Epic, though.
ashleyisawesome, BSN, RN
804 Posts
We use PeriGen with EPIC. Before EPIC we used McKesson and PeriGen. I like it well enough, but haven't used any other program so I don't know if it's good or bad, but I haven't had any major issues with it.
jenrninmi, MSN, RN
1,976 Posts
We use Centricity also, our hospital system is Epic though. Vital signs interface but nothing else. We just switched to Epic in May but had Cerner before that. Same thing, no interfacing except vitals. At least with our package. I have used OB trace vie before and I like it better than Centricity.
labordude, BSN, RN
482 Posts
Have used FetaLink with Cerner as well as WatchChild with Epic. I happen to like FetaLink especially with some of the updates that they plan on making that were more annoying than anything else. My hospital doesn't update right away so we are always 2 packages behind. The WatchChild implementation was poorly done, though the system itself is REALLY good when fully utilized.
kejRN88
25 Posts
I have only used McKesson with Centricity and Epic with Obix (which my hospital currently uses). I don't mind Obix, I like some of the tools that can be used on the strip (baseline, accelerations, decelerations, etc). The thing that I loved about Centricity that Obix doesn't have, is that you cannot chart directly on the strip. That made things so much easier when charting at the bedside.
obnurse406
17 Posts
I'm a traveler and at my current assignment they use Epic and Obix. I don't love Epic, but it's okay. Obix I really don't like at all. I think it just takes some getting used to, but the hospital I was at previously for 5 years used Centricity, and I loved being able to chart directly on the strip. It allows you to chart everything you do in real time, and with Obix all you can do is chart heart tones and contractions in Epic. It's infuriating and I feel like my charging is lacking so much. There's no where to chart position changes, interventions, etc.
michigannurse
2 Posts
@obnurse406 It depends on the type of interface your hospital has purchased. OBIX does provide the ability to click on the strip and document if your hospital has purchased that interface.