The Controversy: Mandatory Flu Vaccines

Many hospitals are moving towards creating mandatory influenza vaccination policies as a condition of employment. Such mandates are causing surefire responses on both sides of the fence. What is the push behind the movement, and what is causing the pushback?

Updated:  

First, let me just go over some of the symptoms of the flu, and then we will get down to business on the controversy surrounding the push to create mandatory flu vaccines for healthcare workers:

  • Sudden onset fever
  • Headache
  • Chills
  • Myalgia
  • Dry cough
  • Sore throat
  • Stuffy nose
  • Loss of appetite
  • Limb or joint pain
  • Difficulty sleeping
  • Diarrhea or upset stomach

I can't think of anyone who wants any of these symptoms, or to come down with the flu, can you?

Influenza vaccination research has clearly documented the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine (Google it - you will find a plethora of information...however, I will list some links at the end of this article for your information). However, even though there is sufficient evidence to prove the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine, vaccination rates among healthcare workers are pitifully low. In 2013, only 55% of nurses in the frontlines were vaccinated.

Organizations such as The Joint Commission, the American Nurses Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Centers for Disease Control, Healthy People 2020, etc., etc., have stated their position on recommending the flu vaccine for healthcare workers in order to decrease the risk of exposure and reduce deaths. Due to this recommendation, many healthcare facilities are now creating mandatory flu vaccine policies as a condition of employment.

Employers who create mandatory policies will have exemptions, of course. Exemptions are made for medical and religious exceptions. For places that do not have a mandatory flu vaccine, they may "strongly recommend" the vaccination and may have a declination form for employees to submit if they refuse the vaccine. Additionally, some employers will enforce refusers to wear a mask during flu season while they are at work in order to protect the patients and the employee.

What is the purpose behind the push toward flu vaccines?

Evidence has shown that there are more than 36,000 deaths in the US each year related to influenza, and more than 200,000 hospitalizations. Influenza is the 6th leading cause of death. Healthcare workers are the leading cause of influenza outbreaks in the healthcare system. up to 50% of people who are infected by the flu virus do not fill ill for several days and can spread the virus to people at risk of complications and death from the flu. Additionally, evidence shows vaccination decreases mortality by 40%, decreases the spread of nosocomial infections by 43%, and decreases absenteeism by 20-30%.

Additionally, there is the ethics to consider. As healthcare workers, we have all taken an oath to "do no harm". As a nurse caring for patients who are not in their most physically healthy state, do we take the vaccination in order to prevent spreading the flu to our vulnerable patients, in order to "do no harm"? We must consider this when we make our decision to take or refuse the vaccination.

What hospitals have created a mandatory flu vaccine policy?

I have the names of a few hospitals, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. This is based on a ListServe survey of hospitals and these are the responses received:

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Philadelphia, PA) - since 2009
  • Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics (Kansas City, MO)
  • Children's Colorado (Aurora, CO)
  • Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters (Norfolk, VA)
  • Children's Medical Center Dallas (Dallas, TX) - since 2012
  • Riley Children's (Indianapolis, IN) - since 2012
  • East Tennessee Children's (Knoxville, TX) - since 2013
  • Boston Children's (Boston, MA)
  • Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns (San Diego, CA) - since 2013
  • Roger Williams Medical Center (Providence, RI)
  • Brookwood Medical Center (Birmingham, AL)
  • Johns Hopkins (all hospitals/clinics) (Baltimore, MD)
  • Driscoll Children's Hospital (Corpus Christi, TX)
  • Spohn Health System (Corpus Christi / San Antonio, TX)
  • All Connecticut Hospitals

What are some reasons that people refuse the flu vaccine?

Refusal may be largely due to misconceptions related to the vaccine. Fears that the immune system will cause them to get the flu, beliefs that hygiene and better nutrition are more helpful than the vaccine, fear of needles, beliefs that the vaccine does not work, and fear of side effects. Others believe that they have a constitutional right to refuse the vaccine and that mandatory policies are violating these rights.

Common concerns and myths about the flu vaccination

(taken from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health outline of flu vaccine talking points for managers)

The flu shot will give me the flu

The flu shot does not give people the flu. It uses inactivated ("dead") virus. People may still catch a cold or other virus that the vaccine is not designed match.

I don't believe the flu vaccine actually works

Studies have shown that flu vaccination prevents flu in 70% to 90% of healthy adults younger than 65 years old.

I had the vaccination last year

You need a new vaccine every year - the virus changes over time.

What about possible adverse reactions

Serious adverse reactions are very rare. They are explained on the CDC's Vaccine Information Statement, which is distributed when the vaccine is administered.

Local short-term reactions - such soreness at the vaccination site, slight fever, achy feeling - may occur but usually do not last long. Over the counter medicines are helpful. Even short-term reactions are much less bothersome than catching the flu and feeling very sick for days.

I'm not in a high-risk group

Your patients are at-risk, and possibly some friends and family members. You can be infected with the flu virus but not feel ill - and can still transmit flu to at-risk patients.

The flu vaccine made every year does not match the circulating flu strain

Inactivated influenza vaccine is effective in preventing transmission and reducing complications of the flu. In years when there is a close match between the vaccine and circulating virus strains, the vaccine prevents illness among approximately 70%--90% of healthy adults under 65 years of age. Vaccinating healthy adults also has been proven to lead to decreased work absenteeism and use of health-care resources, including use of antibiotics. Strong protection is also expected when the vaccine is not a close match with circulating strains, with 50%--77% effectiveness in these instances. In addition, effectiveness against influenza-related hospitalization for healthy adults from inactivated vaccine is estimated at 90%.

Knowledge is Power

All healthcare facilities will be facing the choice of creating a mandatory influenza vaccination in the near future, if they have not already. In order to make an informed decision on the topic, we must have information. Knowledge is power. Before you make a blanket statement on pros or cons, have the information you need, know the research, and make an educated decision.

Please respond to this article by answering the following questions:

  1. Do you take the flu vaccine yearly? If you do not, what is the reason you do not participate (if you don't mind answering this question)?
  2. Does your employer have a mandatory influenza vaccination policy as a condition of employment? If yes, where do you work?
  3. What concerns do you have about the flu vaccine?
  4. Do you know if anyone who has been released from their job because they did not get the flu vaccine?

References

American Association of Family Practitioners. (2011). AAFP supports mandatory flu vaccinations for healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: AAFP Supports Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Health Care Personnel

ATrain. (2014). To accept or refuse the flu vaccine. Retrieved from: ZZZ_133_Influenza: Module 7

CDC. (2014). Vaccination: Who should do it, who should not and who should take precautions. Retrieved from: Vaccination: Who Should Do It, Who Should Not and Who Should Take Precautions | Seasonal Influenza (Flu) | CDC

Influenza Action Coalition. (2015). Influenza vaccination honor roll. Retrieved from: Honor Roll: Mandatory Influenza Vaccination Policies for Healthcare Personnel

Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2014). Talking points for managers. Retrieved from: http://tinyurl.com/p6nbg2u

National adult and influenza immunization summit. (2015). Vaccinating healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: Vaccinating Healthcare Personnel - National Adult and Influenza Immunization Summit

NursingTimes. (2014). Why do health workers decline flu vaccination? Retrieved from: http://www.nursingtimes.net/Journals/2014/11/28/y/k/x/031214-Why-do-health-workers-decline-flu-vaccination.pdf

TJC. (2012). R3 Report: Requirement, rationale, reference. Retrieved from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/R3_Report_Issue_3_5_18_12_final.pdf

Specializes in critical care.
You might think that but it doesn't make it true. I know you are a self-thought expert on all these topics because you "just know" and you "read it" but there have been hundreds of studies on thousands of people of all ages that have demonstrated these adjuncts in the dosages used are booth safe and effective.

You keep saying "herd immunity" is a myth. I have explained it to you many times. It's simple math. You don't even have to be an expert to understand it, and you can definitely Google it and read it on the internet. The herd immunity threshold, look it up.

Most simplified demonstration ever. I'll save rusti the googling.

(PS there probably is profanity in this. It's been awhile since I've watched it and I don't remember for sure, but their videos do generally include profanity)

Specializes in critical care.
What harm is the vaccine causing?...well, for one, I would think the adjuvants injected year after year, have an effect. I never questioned anything for years, (like everyone else), but, it's alarming now how many toxic substances are going in vaccines, and not just mercury. And, it's not just one. Children get 26 from birth to just get to start school. I suppose then the flu vaccine each year for them as well. Then to hear adults getting bad reactions, and the constant downplay and denials. I've read too many "exceptions" to no longer ignore what they may be doing. What responses I've gotten on most of those experiences are the typical ones, but, then there's the personal attacking of poor mothers who are going through literal hell with their once happy, healthy children. I guess I didn't want to get too much into it. But, you asked :)...Just going to the CDC site itself, reading all the substances should be a little disturbing I would think. Anyway, that's it. Besides my own little "experience", I can see how frustrating it is for those who have suffered much worse, only to be dismissed. The part that's more disturbing now is actually forcing people (including children) to take them like it or not. That's most disturbing, and sounding even more "fishy". The "herd" immunity is beyond belief, running the "blood is on your hands" if you DON'T get vaccinated. I'm dumbfounded with it.

I just don't even know where to start with this. You have been programmed by fear-mongering propaganda with little more than speculation.

Is the "once happy, healthy children" referring to autism? How many studies need to be duplicated and recanted for this ridiculous lie to be put to rest?

Not one of these things is based on factual information, except the preservatives in multi dose vials, which have been shown hundreds of millions (billions?) of times to be SAFE.

You claim we are the closed-minded sheeple. I suggest you take a good, long look in the mirror.

Specializes in critical care.
You just demonstrated how herd immunity works! Imagine that.

One case of mealses will result in 12-18 new cases if exposed to a non-immune population.

The herd immunity threshold

The population in California at that time was estimated to be

Boston! We're on the edge of our seats for the rest of this post!

Specializes in Emergency.
Boston! We're on the edge of our seats for the rest of this post!

And boston, you might want to have o'reilly or neely use their unique education skills to reinforce the point.

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
Boston! We're on the edge of our seats for the rest of this post!

I got sidetracked in the middle!

Anyone working in a patient care area needs to get one in LA county, or must wear the mask of shame (that's really all it does; it's not protecting anyone). We have one float nurse wearing one. I'd prefer she just not come work in our clinic as she's putting my immunocompromised patients at risk.

Really, the odd thing is, the vaccine is not "guaranteed" from anything too. So, I actually don't know who's "protected" there either. Of course the unvaccinated are the first to blame with "blood on their hands". This is all becoming rather surreal to say the least. :Ghost: Not having the flu from NOT getting the vaccine is my encounter. :)

Why are y'all continuing to engage and encourage this person?? You're not going to change her/his mind, just providing an opportunity for her/him to continue to spout nonsense and give it some minor semblance of respectability by having it appear to be part of a reasonable debate/discussion.

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
Not having the flu from NOT getting the vaccine is my encounter. :)

You realize how ridiculous this sounds right?

It's one thing to debate the efficacy of the flu shot, which has been problematic, let's be honest. But a general anti vaccine argument being made by someone who doesn't even possess a fifth grade grasp of science and math is another thing altogether. Anyone who continues to link autism and vaccines has zero credibility. This is starting to go into the realm of the delusional.

Specializes in critical care.
I got sidetracked in the middle!

A squirrel!!!

There were 34 cases and out of them 6 were reported to be vaccinated.

You just demonstrated how herd immunity works! Imagine that. Vaccination stopped a pandemic spread.

One case of mealses will result in 12-18 new cases if exposed to a non-immune population. This means about 90% of those exposed will get sick.

The herd immunity threshold for measles is 92-95%. California as of 2015 had vaccination rates for measles dip to 92.6%. We know that there are non-responders to measles vaccination at approximately 1-2%. California was very near the critical threshold for vaccination to stop a pandemic. It spread far enough to get 34 people sick because so many we unvaccinated, luckily the number of vaccinated people were able to stop the spread.

So lets take 1,000 people at the park that day. If 92.6% were vaccinated that leaves 921 vaccinated and 79 unvaccinated. Of those 79 we can estimate 71 will get measles. Of the 921 vaccinated 1-2% will get sick, or about 10-18. So out of 1,000 people we get 81-89 cases of which 10-18 are vaccinated. This is pretty similar to what played out at Disneyland.

Ok well, it supposedly "stopped the spread" of a mild childhood disease (not the plague) that we were encouraged to get, and be immune for life. It still didn't stop the 6 who were vaccinated from getting it, so no guarantees there either. And, as far as I know, no one "suffered" much either. Those who were not vaccinated are now immune for life! There is no way anyone can prove everyone in the park were in contact with those who had the measles. I would imagine once noticed they were kept out of the public. So, the measles vaccine is taking credit for something unproven (and not very scientific is it).

Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
Ok well, it supposedly "stopped the spread" of a mild childhood disease (not the plague) that we were encouraged to get, and be immune for life. It still didn't stop the 6 who were vaccinated from getting it, so no guarantees there either. And, as far as I know, no one "suffered" much either. Those who were not vaccinated are now immune for life! There is no way anyone can prove everyone in the park were in contact with those who had the measles. I would imagine once noticed they were kept out of the public. So, the measles vaccine is taking credit for something unproven (and not very scientific is it).

You seem to be ignorant of the global health crisis that was measles before widespread use of the vaccine. That is not surprising given that you are obviously ignorant about a number of related health issues and practices.

Are you even aware that measles is THE MOST CONTAGIOUS DISEASE KNOWN TO MAN? Do you realize that before we began mass vaccination that more than 2 million humans died each year secondary to measles and the vast majority of those deaths occured in children younger than 6 years of age?

This is just getting ridiculous.

Intentional ignorance deserves to be ignored.