The Controversy: Mandatory Flu Vaccines

Many hospitals are moving towards creating mandatory influenza vaccination policies as a condition of employment. Such mandates are causing surefire responses on both sides of the fence. What is the push behind the movement, and what is causing the pushback?

Updated:  

First, let me just go over some of the symptoms of the flu, and then we will get down to business on the controversy surrounding the push to create mandatory flu vaccines for healthcare workers:

  • Sudden onset fever
  • Headache
  • Chills
  • Myalgia
  • Dry cough
  • Sore throat
  • Stuffy nose
  • Loss of appetite
  • Limb or joint pain
  • Difficulty sleeping
  • Diarrhea or upset stomach

I can't think of anyone who wants any of these symptoms, or to come down with the flu, can you?

Influenza vaccination research has clearly documented the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine (Google it - you will find a plethora of information...however, I will list some links at the end of this article for your information). However, even though there is sufficient evidence to prove the benefits of receiving the flu vaccine, vaccination rates among healthcare workers are pitifully low. In 2013, only 55% of nurses in the frontlines were vaccinated.

Organizations such as The Joint Commission, the American Nurses Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Centers for Disease Control, Healthy People 2020, etc., etc., have stated their position on recommending the flu vaccine for healthcare workers in order to decrease the risk of exposure and reduce deaths. Due to this recommendation, many healthcare facilities are now creating mandatory flu vaccine policies as a condition of employment.

Employers who create mandatory policies will have exemptions, of course. Exemptions are made for medical and religious exceptions. For places that do not have a mandatory flu vaccine, they may "strongly recommend" the vaccination and may have a declination form for employees to submit if they refuse the vaccine. Additionally, some employers will enforce refusers to wear a mask during flu season while they are at work in order to protect the patients and the employee.

What is the purpose behind the push toward flu vaccines?

Evidence has shown that there are more than 36,000 deaths in the US each year related to influenza, and more than 200,000 hospitalizations. Influenza is the 6th leading cause of death. Healthcare workers are the leading cause of influenza outbreaks in the healthcare system. up to 50% of people who are infected by the flu virus do not fill ill for several days and can spread the virus to people at risk of complications and death from the flu. Additionally, evidence shows vaccination decreases mortality by 40%, decreases the spread of nosocomial infections by 43%, and decreases absenteeism by 20-30%.

Additionally, there is the ethics to consider. As healthcare workers, we have all taken an oath to "do no harm". As a nurse caring for patients who are not in their most physically healthy state, do we take the vaccination in order to prevent spreading the flu to our vulnerable patients, in order to "do no harm"? We must consider this when we make our decision to take or refuse the vaccination.

What hospitals have created a mandatory flu vaccine policy?

I have the names of a few hospitals, and this is by no means a comprehensive list. This is based on a ListServe survey of hospitals and these are the responses received:

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Philadelphia, PA) - since 2009
  • Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics (Kansas City, MO)
  • Children's Colorado (Aurora, CO)
  • Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters (Norfolk, VA)
  • Children's Medical Center Dallas (Dallas, TX) - since 2012
  • Riley Children's (Indianapolis, IN) - since 2012
  • East Tennessee Children's (Knoxville, TX) - since 2013
  • Boston Children's (Boston, MA)
  • Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns (San Diego, CA) - since 2013
  • Roger Williams Medical Center (Providence, RI)
  • Brookwood Medical Center (Birmingham, AL)
  • Johns Hopkins (all hospitals/clinics) (Baltimore, MD)
  • Driscoll Children's Hospital (Corpus Christi, TX)
  • Spohn Health System (Corpus Christi / San Antonio, TX)
  • All Connecticut Hospitals

What are some reasons that people refuse the flu vaccine?

Refusal may be largely due to misconceptions related to the vaccine. Fears that the immune system will cause them to get the flu, beliefs that hygiene and better nutrition are more helpful than the vaccine, fear of needles, beliefs that the vaccine does not work, and fear of side effects. Others believe that they have a constitutional right to refuse the vaccine and that mandatory policies are violating these rights.

Common concerns and myths about the flu vaccination

(taken from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health outline of flu vaccine talking points for managers)

The flu shot will give me the flu

The flu shot does not give people the flu. It uses inactivated ("dead") virus. People may still catch a cold or other virus that the vaccine is not designed match.

I don't believe the flu vaccine actually works

Studies have shown that flu vaccination prevents flu in 70% to 90% of healthy adults younger than 65 years old.

I had the vaccination last year

You need a new vaccine every year - the virus changes over time.

What about possible adverse reactions

Serious adverse reactions are very rare. They are explained on the CDC's Vaccine Information Statement, which is distributed when the vaccine is administered.

Local short-term reactions - such soreness at the vaccination site, slight fever, achy feeling - may occur but usually do not last long. Over the counter medicines are helpful. Even short-term reactions are much less bothersome than catching the flu and feeling very sick for days.

I'm not in a high-risk group

Your patients are at-risk, and possibly some friends and family members. You can be infected with the flu virus but not feel ill - and can still transmit flu to at-risk patients.

The flu vaccine made every year does not match the circulating flu strain

Inactivated influenza vaccine is effective in preventing transmission and reducing complications of the flu. In years when there is a close match between the vaccine and circulating virus strains, the vaccine prevents illness among approximately 70%--90% of healthy adults under 65 years of age. Vaccinating healthy adults also has been proven to lead to decreased work absenteeism and use of health-care resources, including use of antibiotics. Strong protection is also expected when the vaccine is not a close match with circulating strains, with 50%--77% effectiveness in these instances. In addition, effectiveness against influenza-related hospitalization for healthy adults from inactivated vaccine is estimated at 90%.

Knowledge is Power

All healthcare facilities will be facing the choice of creating a mandatory influenza vaccination in the near future, if they have not already. In order to make an informed decision on the topic, we must have information. Knowledge is power. Before you make a blanket statement on pros or cons, have the information you need, know the research, and make an educated decision.

Please respond to this article by answering the following questions:

  1. Do you take the flu vaccine yearly? If you do not, what is the reason you do not participate (if you don't mind answering this question)?
  2. Does your employer have a mandatory influenza vaccination policy as a condition of employment? If yes, where do you work?
  3. What concerns do you have about the flu vaccine?
  4. Do you know if anyone who has been released from their job because they did not get the flu vaccine?

References

American Association of Family Practitioners. (2011). AAFP supports mandatory flu vaccinations for healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: AAFP Supports Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Health Care Personnel

ATrain. (2014). To accept or refuse the flu vaccine. Retrieved from: ZZZ_133_Influenza: Module 7

CDC. (2014). Vaccination: Who should do it, who should not and who should take precautions. Retrieved from: Vaccination: Who Should Do It, Who Should Not and Who Should Take Precautions | Seasonal Influenza (Flu) | CDC

Influenza Action Coalition. (2015). Influenza vaccination honor roll. Retrieved from: Honor Roll: Mandatory Influenza Vaccination Policies for Healthcare Personnel

Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. (2014). Talking points for managers. Retrieved from: http://tinyurl.com/p6nbg2u

National adult and influenza immunization summit. (2015). Vaccinating healthcare personnel. Retrieved from: Vaccinating Healthcare Personnel - National Adult and Influenza Immunization Summit

NursingTimes. (2014). Why do health workers decline flu vaccination? Retrieved from: http://www.nursingtimes.net/Journals/2014/11/28/y/k/x/031214-Why-do-health-workers-decline-flu-vaccination.pdf

TJC. (2012). R3 Report: Requirement, rationale, reference. Retrieved from: http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/R3_Report_Issue_3_5_18_12_final.pdf

Specializes in critical care.
:) So explain how you mathematicians would know if the vaccine is working if there is no record of who was vaccinated and contracted the flu? I had the flu and was vaccinated, but no record of it. What it turns out is to be an assumption that the flu vaccine works, and not science (or good math) after all!

It's actually a reportable thing, if my understanding is correct.

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
:) So explain how you mathematicians would know if the vaccine is working if there is no record of who was vaccinated and contracted the flu? I had the flu and was vaccinated, but no record of it. What it turns out is to be an assumption that the flu vaccine works, and not science (or good math) after all!

I am not quite sure I understand what you mean by this, can you clarify? Then we can try and explain.

Remember that the goal of science is to eliminate assumption or chance; in fact that is the definition of "statistical significance".

I've never had a flu shot, and I don't plan on ever getting one.

I've only had the flu ("mild") twice.

If it quacks like a duck (vaccines), walks like a duck, looks like a duck, it might "be" a duck.

Some nurses "get" it, and they formed Nurses Against Mandatory Vaccination.

There are many doctors and nurses and others (parents, etc.) who quietly are refusing to get vaccinated.

These folks are often thoughtful and intelligent, and they are not "sheeple".

They may be in the minority, but sometimes the minority is correct, and the majority years later. finds out it was wrong.

Notice how many drugs were OK'd initially by the FDA (Food & Drug Administration), only to be RECALLED later on.

I'm concerned, lady, as I don't hear the quacking of which you speak.

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.

True sometimes the vast minority is right. Most often the the vast minority is wrong.

The data on vaccine effectiveness and safety is very well established. Those that choose not to believe it, the vast minority in this case, are doing just that: "choosing". Everyone is free to choose what they wish for themselves, but when they hear a "quack" it most often is the blog they googled to try and support their choice.

I am not quite sure I understand what you mean by this, can you clarify? Then we can try and explain. Remember that the goal of science is to eliminate assumption or chance; in fact that is the definition of "statistical significance".
Yes, thank you. Ok, I'll back up. It is confusing. Recently a 9 year old was left paralyzed and blind after a flu vaccine. Family believes flu shot left their daughter paralyzed, vision impaired | abc13.com One other informed us that one died from the flu in his area(and why the vaccine was needed). I asked, "Was the person who died from the flu vaccinated?" This wasn't known. One other asked me "Why would it matter?" I thought it mattered very much. How do you know the vaccine is working if people who ARE getting the flu were vaccinated themselves (as I was the last time I had the flu)?. I would think it's not made public by pro-vaxxers because it wouldn't be a good show for getting vaccinated after all. Also, it was not reported when I myself had the flu a few weeks after a flu vaccine, so I would think there are countless experiences like mine unreported. There would be a great question as to how "effective" the flu vaccine was. Perhaps more so negatively. The "science" and "math" are not accurate afterall. Just to add, :) I'm really not interested, (find it pretty amusing, sometimes gagging) to hear the dance around how "it wasn't the "flu" you had", "it might have been worse", lol and most other made up allegations. The flu shot is presented as the "utmost importance", and if you don't get it others will DIE. Nothing about some become blind and paralyzed from it, contract the flu anyway, or may die themselves. One nurse ended up in ER after being made to take the "mandated vaccine" I remember. Yet the push and the "science" that really makes no sense since it would impossible to know who comes in contact with any flu bug to begin with. Are they counted as a win for the vaccine? I went without the flu every year since NOT getting the vaccine. I credit that to organic foods and vitamins (and my "cold protocol":).
Specializes in Complex pedi to LTC/SA & now a manager.

Family belief does not equal causation.

I'd think it would take one who were headless to not suspect, actually, be pretty positive on all counts, that there would be no other rational reason a perfectly healthy child suddenly become paralyzed and blind as the absolute result of the vaccine, having just had one. I honestly don't think you all know what happens considering more and more vaccines are given to little ones, still insisting they're perfectly "safe".

Specializes in Complex pedi to LTC/SA & now a manager.
I'd think it would take one who were headless to not suspect, actually, be pretty positive on all counts, that there would be no other rational reason a perfectly healthy child suddenly become paralyzed and blind as the absolute result of the vaccine, having just had one. I honestly don't think you all know what happens considering more and more vaccines are given to little ones, still insisting they're perfectly "safe".

You make no sense. One who were headless to make a rash jump to causation without looking at the full assessment? Really? Will vitamin C cure this child?

Most serious neurological adverse effects do not occur within 8 hours post vaccine as in this case. The medical team is not in agreement with the family insisting it must be the flu vaccine as they are still doing testing and assessment. Viral cultures take time to grow and identify. There are a few neurological conditions that can also be the cause. Many caused by exposure to viral illness generally 7 days post exposure

NCIRD | Investigation 2014-15 | Acute Flaccid Myelitis in US Children | CDC

http://www.uptodate.com/contents/etiology-and-evaluation-of-the-child-with-weakness

http://www2.gnb.ca/content/dam/gnb/Departments/h-s/pdf/en/CDC/HealthProfessionals/AEFIsinterpretationandclinicaldefinitionsguide.pdf

I'd think it would take one who were headless to not suspect, actually, be pretty positive on all counts, that there would be no other rational reason a perfectly healthy child suddenly become paralyzed and blind as the absolute result of the vaccine, having just had one. I honestly don't think you all know what happens considering more and more vaccines are given to little ones, still insisting they're perfectly "safe".

Well, mostly, they are living longer and not dying of the measles or the flu. That's what I think is happening. Based on, um, evidence.

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
I'd think it would take one who were headless to not suspect, actually, be pretty positive on all counts, that there would be no other rational reason a perfectly healthy child suddenly become paralyzed and blind as the absolute result of the vaccine, having just had one. I honestly don't think you all know what happens considering more and more vaccines are given to little ones, still insisting they're perfectly "safe".

Vaccines are not "perfectly safe". Anyone who states that is not telling the truth. The truth is, the real absolute truth from millions of vaccinations, is that vaccines are " very safe". Problems unfortunately happen, though serious problems are very rare. The risk of adverse effect from the illness is many fold higher than from the vaccine.

I am not sure of the details for your link above. All we know is that a child who was vaccinated got sick. Historically and statistically it's likely not related to the vaccine. It's associated is all we know just like is associated that the child drank water or milk or ate food or breathed air or a billion other things. I am sorry for that child and his family but it likely has nothing to due with the vaccine.

You make no sense. One who were headless to make a rash jump to causation without looking at the full assessment? Really? Will vitamin C cure this child?

Most serious neurological adverse effects do not occur within 8 hours post vaccine as in this case. The medical team is not in agreement with the family insisting it must be the flu vaccine as they are still doing testing and assessment. Viral cultures take time to grow and identify. There are a few neurological conditions that can also be the cause. Many caused by exposure to viral illness generally 7 days post exposure

NCIRD | Investigation 2014-15 | Acute Flaccid Myelitis in US Children | CDC

Etiology and evaluation of the child with weakness

http://www2.gnb.ca/content/dam/gnb/Departments/h-s/pdf/en/CDC/HealthProfessionals/AEFIsinterpretationandclinicaldefinitionsguide.pdf

With me it is doubtful expecting an objective honest answer from the same claiming that vaccines are "safe", the DTap scream "normal", seizures "normal", autism "normal". I am guessing paralysis and blindness will not be as yet considered "normal", only a "mystery" for now.

And, Vitamin C and E might help...

Combined deficiency of vitamins E and C causes paralysis and death in guinea pigs. - PubMed - NCBI

:)

Btw, is it possible the vaccine depletes the body of Vitamin C so quick and drastically, that paralysis will happen? I certainly would consider that.