Jump to content

Should Patients Have Electronic Identification Numbers?

Headlines   (839 Views | 1 Replies)

21,016 Profile Views; 524 Posts

the idea is that people who use health care would each be assigned a universal patient identifier, or upi. this unique number would link to a person's health records. in principle it would facilitate transfer of a patient's medical history between doctors, hospitals and, likely, insurance companies.


a upi system, using one number that seamlessly connects a person to all of his or her records, could be the safest and most efficient way to manage health-care data.

it would guard against mistaken or stolen patient identities, and make it much easier to pull together a patient's records from disparate providers.

treatment delays and needless medical errors would be greatly reduced.


privacy would suffer. upis will only make it easier for companies and others to use medical data for commercial purposes.

when patients, knowing their doctors have no control over where health-care data go, might refuse to share sensitive information about their minds and bodies.

upis would encourage the government and corporations to build massive, centralized databases of health information, rich targets for data theft and abuse.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

canoehead has 30 years experience as a BSN, RN and specializes in ER.

2 Followers; 6,693 Posts; 49,729 Profile Views

This already exists in countries with universal health care. Every time we access healthcare we provide out ID number to ensure payment to the hospital. Old records are requested under the number via phone and/or computer. Wish they'd auto populate our triage screen, since most people assume I already know all their allergies and meds via the system.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

This site uses cookies. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our Privacy, Cookies, and Terms of Service Policies to learn more.