Ok, here's another NCLEX-type question for you

EricJRN, MSN, RN · May 4, 2007

I'd go with #3. You can give all the meds and nutrition you want, but if you leave the siderails down and the patient cracks his skull... bad things...

JoniL&DRN · May 4, 2007

Hmm that's tough but then it's simple at the same time. I would be inclined to say #3 safety.

I had an instructor that said "First make sure they are breathing. Then make sure than are safe and waht are going to do or not do won't kill them." Doesn't sound like this pt. is having ABC issues now but it DOES sound like he/she may fall down cracking their head and causing what that same instructor called ABC"B" (airway, breathing, circulation and BLOOD BLOOD... BLOOD is BAD. She sang it though it was pretty funny). Benzos, in my understanding, are used to treat/prevent seizure. I be more worried about the pt. hurting themselves at this point.

Do tell.. what does the "book" say?

sugardrops · May 4, 2007

Answer #3 - safety.

forexinegirl · May 4, 2007

my answer is #3...safety first basing on the condition of the client....

TraumaICURN · May 4, 2007

#3...Make sure the patient is safe first!

Lovely_RN, MSN · May 4, 2007

I say #3, ABC and then safety, in this case the patient isn't having ABC issues so safety first.

Nuieve · May 4, 2007

Thanks guys, you made feel a bit better. I picked 3 too. :)

Correct answer:

2. Administer prescribed thiamine.

Rationale is that the patient experiences Wernicke-Korsakoff's syndrome due to malnutrition/withdrawal and the priority is to administer thiamine to prevent further CNS damage/death.

:)

JoniL&DRN · May 4, 2007

What source is that question from? I would have to argue the safety issue I think. Reality is you'd be doing those things in rapid succession. It's like a pt. in HHNKS would you administer NS bolus or insulin first (this was a test question I had... or the basis of one)? Reality... you'd do both probably almost simultaneously. I'd give the thiamine and the benzos but not if the pt. was stumbling around the floor.

Nuieve · May 4, 2007

What source is that question from? I would have to argue the safety issue I think. Reality is you'd be doing those things in rapid succession. It's like a pt. in HHNKS would you administer NS bolus or insulin first (this was a test question I had... or the basis of one)? Reality... you'd do both probably almost simultaneously. I'd give the thiamine and the benzos but not if the pt. was stumbling around the floor.

It's from Thomson Delmar NCLEX practice questions CD. To be honest I too am not really happy with the rationale, however my justification would be that

1) administration of thiamine won't take too much time (providing safety is a long process, side rails, cleaning the room of obstacles etc...), so by administering it and then taking care of general safety is less likely to cause damage (as long as the patient won't jump out of the window or hit his head against the table while the nurse is drawing the medication) than making the environment secure (which might be a continuous process) and only then giving the med.

2) it relates to the question more (provided that one understands that described symptoms are those of WK sydrome)

3) it relates to the current problem (damage to the CNS is happening at the moment), and general safety is more of a "risk for..."/future issue.

It's a fine line, I know... :)

Leilah75_RN · May 4, 2007

oh my, i am about to say #3 as well...now i know why i failed nclex haha...but #2 seems rational...lol

blackmama · May 4, 2007

For me its #3 because based on the client situation,his having difficulties in balance or gait,diplopia etc...so the patient is unable to focus and he is prone to injury therefore my answer is choice # 3...SAFETY