The use of private insurers to deliver Medicare drug coverage "is driving up costs"

  1. WASHINGTON -- The Republicans who created a prescription-drug benefit for Medicare four years ago said private health insurers would be more efficient than the federal government at providing the coverage. Now Democrats say they have proof that isn't the case.
    A new analysis, compiled by congressional investigators at the request of Rep. Henry Waxman (D., Calif.) and set to be released in the coming week, said private insurers selling Medicare-funded drug coverage aren't getting "significant" discounts from drug makers and that the discounts they receive aren't always shared with Medicare beneficiaries.
    The report said taxpayers and Medicare beneficiaries would have saved almost $15 billion this year if the drug plans had administrative costs similar to traditional Medicare's hospital and physician coverage, and discounts on drugs similar to those obtained by the government in Medicaid, the state-federal program for the poor.
    The analysis is likely to touch off debate on Capitol Hill over changes that many Democrats want to make to the Medicare drug program. These include giving the government authority to bargain with drug makers for lower prices and reducing out-of-pocket costs for beneficiaries.
    Source: accessed today.
  2. Visit HM2VikingRN profile page

    About HM2VikingRN

    Joined: Apr '06; Posts: 11,159; Likes: 11,316


  3. by   woody62
    I remember when Part D was passed and announced. My dear SIL told me, 'look, see what the President and the Republican Party has done for you.' My first thought, just how expensive is it going to get for me and the tax payers. In one year, my premium went from $63 a month to more then $98 a month. It went so high, I found that I could no longer afford the Gold Plan, with the no donut hole, no deductible. I was disappointed but I cannot say I was very surprised. I expected that either my insurance provider or my pharmacy would up the cost to me. I have not been surprised. I had questioned the allowance of private insurance companies being allowed to administer Part D. They are all in it for the profit. They have no incentive to keep the cost low, to either the government or the individual. I would prefer the Canadian plan.

  4. by   teeituptom
    Bushie and the Republicans can mess up anything