NCLEX Book...which one?

Published

Hey everybody! I just completed my first semester of Nursing School and hope to graduate May 2008. I was looking at NCLEX review books today but I have no idea which one is the best one to get! There are some that say "Guaranteed to pass", so I was tempted to buy one of those but I wanted to get on this board to see what everyone had to say before I bought one. But anyway if you anybody has a suggestion on which one to purchase, I would appreciate it!! Thanks and Merry Christmas to everyone!

saunders nothing else

I used Saunder's Comprehensive Review for content and found the Kaplan RN 2007 Strategies book to be helpful for test taking skills.

Specializes in Geriatric and now peds!!!!.

Saunders and NCLEX made incredibly easy

I read both of them and passed the PN NCLEX on the first try!!

Wendy

LPN

Specializes in PEDS ~ PP ~ NNB & LII Nursery.

Exam Cram-RN, Saunders, and Kaplan. I had what seemed like 100 different books but I think this combination is the best. You will find that everyone will have a variety of choices but you will see Saunders and Kaplan both repeated here often. The Exam Cram is what I stumbled on (not many have heard of it) but felt very fortunate to have discovered it and would also buy the other Exam Cram Q&A if I was to do it all over again. I liked the book that much! IMO these three will prepare any one with any learning style or weak area.

It's a winning combination!

Good luck this spring. Just think it is almost over, but that dreaded NCLEX makes the final difference. Don't under estimate!

I thank all of you so much for letting me know which one worked best for you. This definitely helps me so thank you!!!! icon7.gif

I think I have more NCLEX review books than text books....Saunders, Lippincott, HESI, Davis's, Kaplan, The complete Reviews and Rationales series, Straight A's, Incredibly Easy's, The Coloring Books, X made simple...etc...I like all of them...each for a different reason

Saunders!! Stay away from Lippincot's NCLEX 3500 - - SO many errors and the rationales are really poor.

+ Add a Comment