3 Reasons Why Nursing Schools are Turning Away Candidates During a Nursing Shortage

Did you know that over 56,000 qualified nursing school applicants were turned away in 2017? This number is shocking by itself but added to the fact that we are in the midst of a nursing shortage, makes it downright confusing. Learn why this is happening at nursing schools across the country. Nurses Announcements Archive

Published

Over 56,000 qualified nursing school applicants were turned away in 2017. You read that right - 56,000. This is happening while hospitals and clinics continue to report a nursing shortage. According to Becker's Hospital Review, some of these qualified applicants are graduating high school with a 3.5 GPA or higher. These are candidates that will likely be successful nursing students.

You may be wondering why this is happening in the middle of a nursing shortage. Let's discuss the statistics, reasons for the problem, and a few solutions.

The Statistics

Here are a few concerning statistics about the number of aspiring nurses being turned away each year by nursing programs:

  • The National League of Nurses reported that up to 45% of ADN applicants and 36% of BSN applicants were turned away in 2014
  • Cabrillo College in Aptos, California reported having hundreds on their wait list for a 60-seat nursing program
  • Many schools are saying that applicants will be on wait-lists for up to six years and some schools are discontinuing wait lists altogether

The Reasons

To fix the problem, you need to understand why thousands of students are turned down each year by nursing schools across the country.

Not Enough Instructors

Nursing faculty positions go unfilled year and year. In fact, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing reported in their Special Survey on Vacant Faculty positions that the United States has an annual national nursing faculty vacancy rate of slightly over 7%. This equates to about two teachers for every nursing program out there. And, over 90% of these vacancies require or prefer the nurse filling the position to have a doctoral degree.

The survey went on to break down the vacancies by region. The most substantial number of vacancies can be found in the Midwest, with nearly 10% of all faculty positions remaining unfilled. Just behind that region was the South (9.7%), North Atlantic (9.5%), and finally the West (9%). If you look at the issue by type of institution - 9.6% of all vacancies are found at public colleges. And, one more break down tells us that the largest number of vacancies are in Baccalaureate programs (14.6%).

Do Nurses Want to Be Instructors?

Being a nursing instructor may be of interest to many nurses until they begin doing their homework about the position and salaries. Up to 18% of all faculty positions do not have a tenure system at the institution, and another 32.6% of the jobs just don't qualify. The amount of education required for these vacant positions appears to be another barrier. Over 22% of all vacant positions required a doctoral degree.

The special report by the AACN also reports that many schools have insufficient funds to hire new faculty. And, in some schools, the administration doesn't support the additional faculty positions, even though they are turning away potential students.

Clinical Space Shortage

All programs require a significant amount of hands-on experience in a clinical setting. Finding nursing units available for clinicals can be a challenge for nursing programs. If we had enough faculty, would they receive the training they needed? The answer is probably, no.

Many schools are reporting that there are a limited number of clinical spaces for students to get this experience. And, finding preceptors in specialty areas can be another barrier. This has further compounded the need to turn away qualified nursing school applicants.

Higher Clinical Nurse Salaries

As clinical nursing salaries continue to grow, nursing faculty salaries have not been able to compete. Up to 33.9% of schools with faculty vacancies reported that noncompetitive wages were to blame for the inability to fill the position. In fact, the AACN reported in March 2016 that a masters-prepared faculty member made an average of $77,022 per year. Compare this to a masters-prepared nurse practitioner salary of $87,000, and you can easily see why these positions are difficult to fill.

The Answers

Identifying the problem is only half the bottle. Let's explore a few solutions to this nursing dilemma.

Bridge Programs

Many nurses choose nursing as a second career. Or, they start out as an LPN or ADN and move up to a master's or doctoral prepared nurse later on in their career. Professionals can make these transitions with the use of bridge programs.

These programs allow qualified candidates to continue their education when it's convenient for them. These programs have adopted an online format over the past several years, making it even easier for nurses to continue to work and advance their education. With the help of bridge programs, some of these faculty positions could be filled.

Think Outside the Box for Clinical Sites

As our healthcare environment moves away from extended hospital stays, nursing programs need to consider new locations for clinicals. Instructors are now turning to rehab centers and nursing facilities to gain exposure to patients who were once kept after surgeries and other procedures.

Nursing jobs are changing too. Looking for preceptors in-home care, hospice, and other community-based settings is crucial for the future of nursing education. And, it gives students exposure to non-hospital nursing career options.

Create a Competitive Salary Structure

Teaching is such an essential career, yet, teachers across all industries seem to have lower paying salaries. There is undoubtedly a demand for more nursing instructors, so this needs to be rectified.

If you are interested in pursuing a career as a nurse faculty member - you can increase your earning potential based on the location and type of school. You may also look at roles, such as nurse education director, to improve your salary.

What are your thoughts about nursing schools turning away qualified applicants? Have you experienced a long wait-list or other issue related to starting your nursing education? We would love to hear your thoughts and experiences.

I'd love to teach. But I also like having a roof over my head and maybe some food.

Specializes in school nurse.
The only shortage I'm seeing is nursing students who actually want to be nurses.

Amen! A lot of "kids" are still working on their pre-reqs and in their heads, they're already planning NP/CNA school!

Re: the "shortage". Um...no. In many cases, more of a decision not to fill and/or create positions. There may be some geographical anomalies, but some good ole' fashioned hiring bonuses and relocation assistance would help with that.

Specializes in Urgent Care, Oncology.

I actually started in a mixed cohort of FNP + MSN Administration + MSN Education students. We all take the same beginning 20 foundation credits so they lump us all together. Of the 150 or so of us who started together, only 8 are MSN Education students. :(

Specializes in Gerontology, Med surg, Home Health.

On my sub-acute/rehab unit we do EVERYTHING the hospital does with the exception of vents. We do large bore chest tubes, TPN, trachs, IV inotropics, IV push.....call around to the local SNFs...they'd love having students.

Specializes in burn ICU, SICU, ER, Trauma Rapid Response.

The author asserts there is a nursing shortage as if that an established fact. It isn't. I'd like to see the data that leads her to that conclusion.

Specializes in M/S, Pulmonary, Travel, Homecare, Psych..

Nursing schools are judged by their ability to put the students in a position to pass boards first try. They are not concerned with fixing the nursing shortage. Hence their focus is on only accepting students who further their agenda. Anyone who doesn't match their criteria that decides who will and won't pass first time exactly.......it turned away.

To me, that's the issue. Too much separation between the schools and how they're "measured" and reality. For schools to take an active hand in contributing to the communities around them, we first must stop putting them in a position where they have to do so while also complying with ancient "pass or fail" accreditation.

I mean, really. How many of us at some point haven't said "The difference between school and reality is too wide a gap."?

So why use a such a flawed measuring stick to accredit the schools? Even more so, why let focus on said test be the core value of nursing education?

Change that........and in my humble opinion, a lot of other things will naturally fall in place.

Specializes in Peds/outpatient FP,derm,allergy/private duty.

This particular talking point isn't new, and it's propagated by a sector of the nursing universe who have a vested interest in lots and lots of students going through their nursing programs. So, I can't agree this is "shocking".

Something I find peculiar about this, is the implication that everyone who is "qualified" is thereby entitled to a seat in the program the want to attend and if they are not admitted they are cheated of their rights.

I'm pretty sure there are many other professional degree programs who turn away qualified applicants. Competition generally results in a certain number of prospective students busting their butt to stand out from the crowd. Why should we assume this is a bad thing?

Specializes in Family Nurse Practitioner.

I'm pretty sure there are many other professional degree programs who turn away qualified applicants. Competition generally results in a certain number of prospective students busting their butt to stand out from the crowd. Why should we assume this is a bad thing?

I only wish NP program admissions considered this most sage point. It is a debacle.

Something I find peculiar about this, is the implication that everyone who is "qualified" is thereby entitled to a seat in the program the want to attend and if they are not admitted they are cheated of their rights.

I'm pretty sure there are many other professional degree programs who turn away qualified applicants. Competition generally results in a certain number of prospective students busting their butt to stand out from the crowd. Why should we assume this is a bad thing?

Especially with the range of required admission qualifications between programs. It does make sense from a business perspective for schools to get their hands on as many applications as they can, and not limit their applicant pool by setting the bar too high. But if the qualifications are more on the low-bar side at a particular school, well, there are many, many people out there who are going to be way more qualified than someone who merely meets the basic requirements. I'm not sure we have to wring our hands about those who aren't accepted in these types of circumstances - yet they would be counted in the numbers of those qualified applicants who were "turned away."

I don't know anyone of (apparent) normal intelligence who minimally had their "stuff" together but was ultimately "turned away" completely from [all] nursing school(s) and had to choose a different career path.

Specializes in OB-Gyn/Primary Care/Ambulatory Leadership.
Nursing schools are judged by their ability to put the students in a position to pass boards first try. They are not concerned with fixing the nursing shortage. Hence their focus is on only accepting students who further their agenda. Anyone who doesn't match their criteria that decides who will and won't pass first time exactly.......it turned away.

You say that as if it's a bad thing.

Specializes in Adult Internal Medicine.
The author asserts there is a nursing shortage as if that an established fact. It isn't. I'd like to see the data that leads her to that conclusion.

I am not sure why the author used a secondary source (Beckers via CNN via AACN) to cite for the article, but most of the data mentioned comes direct from the AACN and is located here: Nursing Shortage.

The primary BLS data is here: Registered Nurses : Occupational Outlook Handbook: : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and here Registered Nurses.

There are a few difficult issues being discussed here, and some of them are rather hotly debated.

I am not sure most people would debate there is a dearth of qualified nursing faculty and this is magnified by the fact that nursing programs are lucrative business for colleges and universities at a time when demand for nursing spots is peaking. At the same time there is quite a bit of attrition, over 10% a year, most to non-academic nursing jobs. There is also significant retirement attrition as nursing faculty is aging. The market hasn't fully corrected to this and while faculty pay has increased in the past decade it doesn't seem to match demand nor clinical wages especially as faculty are expected to have terminal degrees.

Clinical education, which lies partly out of academia control, is a difficult bottleneck as nursing is changed with more acuity and higher ratios making less room for clinical education. I wasn't around for the days of resident nursing education but perhaps that model will come back into favor as hospitals look to cut non-billable costs.

Last but not least, the nursing shortage debate. There is absolutely a purveyed and perceived nursing shortage that is supported by data from the BLS based on predictions. The data from the AACN tells me nothing more than there is a high demand for nursing students, it doesn't say anything about a demand for nurses. There is also some reasonable counters to the BLS predictions: nursing wages have remained relatively stagnant in the face of a "shortage" and the number of underemployed nurses has been reported as high as 20-25% even though unemployment is low at 2-3% for RNs. There are lots of employers posting jobs they don't intend to fill seems to be the word on the street.

My two cents.

Specializes in Nursing Professional Development.
This particular talking point isn't new, and it's propagated by a sector of the nursing universe who have a vested interest in lots and lots of students going through their nursing programs. So, I can't agree this is "shocking".

Something I find peculiar about this, is the implication that everyone who is "qualified" is thereby entitled to a seat in the program the want to attend and if they are not admitted they are cheated of their rights.

I'm pretty sure there are many other professional degree programs who turn away qualified applicants. Competition generally results in a certain number of prospective students busting their butt to stand out from the crowd. Why should we assume this is a bad thing?

I clicked the "like" button for this post ... but really wanted to click "love." Nursing SHOULD be selective about the people it admits into the schools. And it is perfectly normal for a high quality school to have more applicants than slots available. I wouldn't want to go to a school that allowed just anybody off the street to attend. Sometimes, selectivity is a good thing.

Also, people don't have a "right" to go to school in their home neighborhood -- which is what some people insist on. If you value education and/or really want to make a career for yourself in any field, you should be willing to be a bit flexible about your path to achieve your goals. You might have to move to a new region to find the right school for you. Or you might have to make some financial sacrifices. etc.

That's why I am so concerned about the fact that we don't seem to have good numbers on some aspects of this topic. I suspect there are many people counted among those who have been "turned away from school" who actually could go to nursing school if they would just be a little flexible about which school they attend ... and/or they prepared themselves to be a competitive applicant by studying, getting good grades, getting some health care experience, etc.

+ Add a Comment