Uninsurable because she was raped.....

The rape is "unfortunate" and you love that she's been denied coverage because of it? What a truly distasteful post.

You can choose to take the dramatic road and pretend that the rape is the core issue here. It isn't. It's just the most emotional/shocking factor. She was denied insurance because of a technicality with the drugs that made her seem a higher risk then she actually is. You know, it wouldn't kill you to take a little more time with reading comprehension rather then rewording everything you read in such a way that it gives you offense. In no way, shape or form did I say I love that she was raped. The beauty lies in the fact that she's made her living off of denying coverage to others based on same possible risk factors that she's having to deal with now. She's become a victim of the same system she was all too happy to serve. There's a wonderful sense of karmic justice in the air. I'm sorry if you cant see that.

What I see and, what I think most of us are aware of, is that old rape consequences and ideologies have never quite gone away. That she should and must be repeatedly tested for HIV (among other diseases) for periods of time ranging from months to the remainder of her life are a direct result of the rape.

I find your "karmic justice" theory and the snickering middle school - like elation you're finding because
the victim just happened to be in the insurance industry, disgusting and immature. Before I get clobbered for personally attacking another member, I did NOT say you yourself personally were immature, I stated that I found the very idea that payback was appropriate simply because of her job, sounded like a 13 year old girl's statement. I'm done with this thread for now -- I'm off to the other side again.

sharpeimom

You can choose to take the dramatic road and pretend that the rape is the core issue here. It isn't. It's just the most emotional/shocking factor. She was denied insurance because of a technicality with the drugs that made her seem a higher risk then she actually is. You know, it wouldn't kill you to take a little more time with reading comprehension rather then rewording everything you read in such a way that it gives you offense. In no way, shape or form did I say I love that she was raped. The beauty lies in the fact that she's made her living off of denying coverage to others based on same possible risk factors that she's having to deal with now. She's become a victim of the same system she was all too happy to serve. There's a wonderful sense of karmic justice in the air. I'm sorry if you cant see that.

You can choose to take the dramatic road and pretend that the rape is the core issue here. It isn't. It's just the most emotional/shocking factor. She was denied insurance because of a technicality with the drugs that made her seem a higher risk then she actually is. You know, it wouldn't kill you to take a little more time with reading comprehension rather then rewording everything you read in such a way that it gives you offense. In no way, shape or form did I say I love that she was raped. The beauty lies in the fact that she's made her living off of denying coverage to others based on same possible risk factors that she's having to deal with now. She's become a victim of the same system she was all too happy to serve. There's a wonderful sense of karmic justice in the air. I'm sorry if you cant see that.

What I see and, what I think most of us are aware of, is that old rape consequences and ideologies have never quite gone away. That she should and must be repeatedly tested for HIV (among other diseases) for periods of time ranging from months to the remainder of her life are a direct result of the rape.