Re: National Health Care, Your Thoughts
Take a look at the article from Bloomberg on this thread about Medicare Part D - a government endorsed plan that was doomed from the start because "the fox is in the henhouse". Those grandiose pharmaceutical companies, with their huge tax deductable marketing programs have done the thing they do best - padded their administrrative costs and passed them on to the recipient of their medicines.
It's time that negotiating skills was added to the schools' curriculum, so that someone who later becomes employed by a healthcare system learns to say "no!" to those companies that impoverish and cause medical "plans of care" to fail.
If you'd like to see the acuity of patients drop, preventive consistent care is the way to getting that. Our healthcare programs, even though they give "lipservice" to prevention, don't monitor compliance. Once it becomes obvious that a patient needs homecare for medicine management, B.P. monitoring, kidney function, DM treatment, etc. illnesses will continue to worsen, and our morbidity and mortality rates will continue to rise. Our present state of the art care is most embarressing, compared to other countries. Be part of the solution!
Whoever said the Canadian and UK healthcare systems aren't efficient, needs to learn more about them, and the standards our private insurance companies and medic-aid/cal set. They're the same, although here, we think we're getting what we pay for; that couldn't be farther from the truth!
Becoming educated, especially through the websites HMViking shares, would help those who speak/write from their gut. Kudos to you, HMViking!
Nursing News