Re: Socialized medicine pros and cons
Inevitably, longevity of any program determines its success. All over the world, nations that have depended on socialized medicine are going broke fast, and they're scrambling for a better way. Unfortunately, we've also seen in America that government programs never end and are rarely successful. Government run healthcare, (nothing more than a government run healthcare program), called many things simply to change its meaning and make it more palatable to its citizenry, falls right into the same category as all other government programs that have failed miserably over the last 50 years in America. Before $90 Billion dollars has been spent on the war on poverty, 8.8% of America was said to be living in poverty. Today, the rate is said to be 9.6%. Similarly with public education, we spend over 9 times more per student today (adjusted for inflation) educating them only to find out our students are dumber than they've ever been after graduation. The answer: Spend more money. The logic in this escapes me.
Today, national healthcare is fizzing out as countrys all over the world are bankrupting themselves because its healthcare budget is growing faster than its economy and there's just no more capital to tax. And yes, they are trying to introduce competition into their systems. Imagine that! The United States, ironically, is trying to adopt a system similar to all the ones that are failing across the globe. America is in a similar quagmire because it abandoned its free market principles during the great depression, as government became a guarantor of coverage and drove the cost of healthcare through the roof. Anything government has ever done, they've done it poorly and inneffeciently.
I would submit that canadians pay such an exorbitant income tax rate because its government is ineffecient with everything it does. Why? Because its not their money. They do nothing to create it. They are in the business of taking it from private citizens and spending it, many times with good intentions. In Canada, do the Elites in government have the exact same coverage as the private citizens? Or just maybe it's just a little bit better? Maybe a lot better? That covers the quality of national healthcare in a nutshell. If government doesn't have to use it, then it's not very good.
Nursing News