Nurses Helping Nurses
allnurses Network: Central | Jobs | Books | Newsletter
allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses
Home General News Blogs Articles Students Region Specialty Degrees F.A.Q.
Philippine Nursing Forum /

Supreme Court's Decision regarding NLE



Did You Know?
allnurses is the largest community for nurses on the web. We now have over 388,769 members! Join today to network with other nurses, laugh, share, and much more.
Page 1 of 4 1 234 >

Oct 13, 2006 08:08 AM

Supreme Court's Decision regarding NLE

by ^same^

hi to all june 2006 examinees...

just want to inform everyone that as of today 5pm. our supreme court has already announced its decision regarding the controversial june 2006 nursing licensure exam.

its decision includes:
1. nullity with statistical treatment done by P.R.C.
they will use the original list of board passers without the used statistical treatment. (those who passed because of the statistical treatment will have a retake on of test 3 & 5 which is 1, 687 examinees), (1, 186 examinees who failed because of the statistical treatment may be given their slot back in the roster)
2. those who belong to the original list of passer without the statistical treatment who will be proven to have attended review and final coaching of the 3 alleged review centers may not be issued licenses or revoked...

that's what i have seen on channel 2... just browse on newspapers and news... later ... God bless!


Share

Search Tags
None
Top

 
Advertisement
Sponsored Links
 
Page 1 of 4 1 234 >
Reply
36 Comments
No. 1
from ^same^
Old Oct 13, 2006, 08:09 AM

Default Re: Supreme Court's Decision regarding NLE
just post your additional infos... thank u!
Top
 
No. 2
from ^same^
Old Oct 13, 2006, 08:10 AM

Default Re: Supreme Court's Decision regarding NLE
ei i forgot in addition, there will be pursuance of postponed oath taking, registration and release of licenses...
Top
 
No. 3
from flight027
Old Oct 13, 2006, 09:28 AM

Default Re: Supreme Court's Decision regarding NLE
afaik, the court said those examinees who would be found to have gained from the leaked questions can still be removed from the roster of passed examinees.

however, the NBI said they won't be pursuing any actions against the students at this time because, in their own words, it would be impossible to prove who actually gained from the leaked questions. mere possesion of the leaked questions, they said, does not prove culpability.



Originally Posted by ^same^
hi to all june 2006 examinees...


2. those who belong to the original list of passer without the statistical treatment who will be proven to have attended review and final coaching of the 3 alleged review centers may not be issued licenses or revoked...

that's what i have seen on channel 2... just browse on newspapers and news... later ... God bless!
Top
 
No. 4
from pinoy_guy
Old Oct 13, 2006, 10:04 AM
Updated Oct 13, 2006 at 10:13 AM by pinoy_guy

Default Court of Appeals, not Supreme Court, Decision
just want to point out that it was the Court of Appeals ruling, not the Supreme Court's.

if this case reaches the Supreme Court, it might take a year or more before the case can be decided with finality.

I think everything rests on whether this batch will be accepted by foreign employers, if these foreign employers are satisfied with the way the government tied up the loose ends. (loose ends: the Senate testimony of leakage of Tests 1 & 2, the claims of Bautista that a review center transmitted its review outside Manila & Baguio, specifically to Cebu & Davao.) reports about these loose ends are all over the Philippine news websites on the Internet.


Originally Posted by flight027
the court said those examinees who would be found to have gained from the leaked questions can still be removed from the roster of passed examinees.
the NBI report said it will be "difficult, if not impossible" to determine who benefitted from the Leakage.


Originally Posted by inq7.net
The court also noted that “only the examinees that may be identified by the National Bureau of Investigation to have attended the final coaching at Gapuz, Inress and Pentagon, were to be penalized with a retaking of tests 3 and 5.

The three review centers have been identified by the NBI as having been allegedly involved in the leakage.
will these reviewers take this sitting down? "mere possession of the leaked questions, they said, does not prove culpability." what's sauce for the goose should be sauce for the gander.

it's sad that these graduates spent a lot of money to review at these centers, and will be made to retake Tests 3 & 5.


Originally Posted by flight027
however, the NBI said they won't be pursuing any actions against the students at this time because, in their own words, it would be impossible to prove who actually gained from the leaked questions. mere possesion of the leaked questions, they said, does not prove culpability.
ouch. "at this time" can mean anything--even revocation of license later when they decide that a graduate had access to the Leakage.

it will be easy to determine who got the Leakage--the NBI had compared the names of the reviewees of the affected review centers with the list of passers. I wonder why they did not say anything about this with the release of their report on the Leakage issue.
Top
 
No. 5
from pinoy_guy
Old Oct 13, 2006, 10:34 AM

Default Re: Court of Appeals, not Supreme Court, Decision
Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita said the decision to defer issuing the executive order came after the National Bureau of Investigation submitted a report identifying five review centers that leaked the questions.

The NBI is now trying to construct a listing to match those who enroled in these review centers to the list of exam passers of the Professional Regulatory Commission,” Ermita said.

. . .

The bureau report said the five review centers were all in Luzon.

http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/?...ws1_oct11_2006
from 5 to 3.

and what happened to the NBI list matching "those who enroled in these review centers to the list of exam passers of the Professional Regulatory Commission?"
Top
 
No. 6
from pinoy_guy
Old Oct 13, 2006, 11:57 AM

Default Re: Court of Appeals, not Supreme Court, Decision
amazing how different news agencies report different aspects of the issue.

the issue regarding retake was tackled by the Court of Appeals.


It (the Court of Appeals), however, agreed with the NBI’s findings that there were examinees who attended the "final coaching session" of Gapuz, Inress and Pentagon before the NLE who may have benefited from the leakage.

But it stressed that only the examinees who may be identified later by the NBI or PRC and BON to have attended the final coaching should be penalized with retaking Tests III and V.

On the other hand, the CA said those who did not review and those who reviewed but did not attend the final coaching session of the said review centers should be allowed to take their oath and be given their licenses.

http://www.mb.com.ph/MAIN2006101476983.html
Top
 
No. 7
from nei_ph
Old Oct 13, 2006, 12:24 PM

Default Re: Supreme Court's Decision regarding NLE
any of u guys got any ideas how will they come up with the 1,687 students that would retake test 3 and 5?

i have a feeling that those who got a rating of FLAT 75% would be included.

well, i really hope that won't be the case, or I'll sure be in a huge trouble...
Top
 
No. 8
from Mike28770
Old Oct 13, 2006, 07:21 PM
Updated Oct 14, 2006 at 09:21 AM by Mike28770

Default Re: Supreme Court's Decision regarding NLE
Ohhhh Sorry I made mistake! And removed my comments. Bad logic day...Sorry
Top
 
No. 9
from pRinSesa
Old Oct 13, 2006, 11:18 PM

Default Re: Supreme Court's Decision regarding NLE
hey..lists of passers came out TWICE?!? how come i ddnt know that? sHoot me!!!
Top
 
Page 1 of 4 1 234 >
Reply




Thread Tools


Who's Online
88 members
1,143 guests
1,231

5

Four Lehigh Valley Health Network nurses accused of...

48

lawsuit - But don't most RN's work through breaks/lunch...

0

Patient Evaluation of Retail Clinic Care

7

The hard to reach on-call doctor, and its effects on...

12

Woman charged with passing off prescription drug as...

26

Man in "Vegetative State" was conscious for 23...

2

Interesting article on ThedaCare's Collaborative Care Model

14

Possible breakthrough regarding MS

63

16th Philly area hospital to stop delivering babies: Mercy...

14

Really interesting article on Indian open hearts



45

Dear preceptor

1

Society Needs Care Too

13

Why am I doing this, anyway?

2

Nurse Heal Thyself

10

My Papa, why I am the nurse I am today.

17

I made it through

11

An angel's gaze

16

A Sister Never Forgets

16

Ruby's Marbles

42

What Do Operating Room Nurses Do?

14

My Little Old Jedi

21

I love this job......

23

"I hear voices"

20

Preventing FRUTI (Foley Related Urinary Tract Infection) in...

24

Error and Attitude





Sponsored Links

Currently Reading This Page: 1 (0 members & 1 guests)

Interested in the hottest topics of the week? Subscribe to the Nurse-zine Newsletter.
Enter email address: