Re: Should the H1N1 Vaccine be mandatory for Healthcare Professionals?
There must have been a problem getting HCWs to take the HepB series of vaccinations, as anyone who doesn't want to do that, signs a release saying they either had the series previously, or refuse to have it. The Employee Health Nurse can order (with consent of a new employee), a test for HbSAb. If the result is HbSAg +, he/she will have to work where the danger of exposing patients to their carrier state isn't a potential risk.
Since there's nowhere a HCW can work as such without exposing others to H1N1, when he/she's communicable (notice that I wrote "when", not "if"), she/he shouldn't work at all until the risk is over! If I for any reason couldn't take the vaccine without risking my life, I'd leave nursing until the risk of acquiring it is over; and I'd stay away from crowded indoor spaces.
Those who refuse to take the vaccine must be sure it could be lethal for them to take it. Therefore they should get as much information as they can, about the vaccine having been administered to many human volunteers during the research of it. I've read that online, and I'm convinced that a sufficient number of people have received the vaccine without ill effect, that I will take it. However, I believe HCWs have a right to refuse it, as mandatory administration of anything to employees is wrong - legally and morally. However employers can and should require anyone who hasn't taken the vaccine, to take an unpaid leave of absence.
The reason I feel so strongly about that, is because I'd hate to see nurses as "Typhoid Marys" exposing the public to a disease that has been shown to be lethal, when a vaccine is available to render them immune. If people with active Tb refuse (or are unreliable) to take their meds, the court can, and does restrict them to their homes, sending HH nurses in to give the meds by injection forceably, if need be. It would be a real pity if an insufficient number of HCWs made that necessary with nurses. However the length of time it takes the vaccine to render immunity, would make it unrealistic to do that. So the public will have to get the vaccine so that unvaccinated nurses won't spread H1N1 to them!
Now read about it, folks and believe what the CDC and WHO say about researching it sufficiently, before advising its use. It's shear paranoia to think that those agencies would intentionally mislead us and the public, for heaven's sake!!! I listened to a radio "talk show" this morning, which had a "neurosurgeon" speaking against vaccines in general, the one against H1N1 specifically, siting all the old and now unused substances that were in vaccines, such as formaldehyde. He talked about them having more than "a dose" of mercury in each dose of vaccine, while the program host gasped. Now is that idiotic? How much mercury is a dose, and why would it be considered that?
Nursing News