airbender....thanks!
kudos! ...and thank you for this link. this is great information for prospective nursing students.
http://www.ocnnursingdiversity.org/d...2010report.pdf 
nursing programs
do need to be strong in ethics, in values, and in rigor. no one wants to become an rn, so they can kill patients. last i checked, all nurses need to pass the nclex to get their licences.
the osbn website, posts nclex pass rates, not retention rates. i'm greatful....but nclex pass rates alone don't mean a lot... a number alone, is just a number.
the state of california has nclex pass rates
and retention rates for nursing programs. context makes stats more meaningful:
example1: -100% nclex pass rate:20% retention rate- (10/50)
in a 50 seat program, 10 consistantly graduate. all 10 consistantly pass the nclex - 100% pass. (the 10 who passed, may still not have the gpas to enter a bsn program.)
example2: -70% nclex pass rate: 80% retention rate. (35/50)
in a 50 seat program, 40 consistantly graduate and 35 consistantly pass the nclex 1st time..... i know which program looks better to me.
(the 5 who failed can re-take and pass the nclex. all 40, can
still be nurses. the ones who re-take, may even be better rn's. all, may have the gpa's to enter a bsn program. )
.................................................. ................................
good stats on a program, would lead to a better fit for nursing students - and a better fit for nursing programs. better data, better results - for everyone.
nursing programs take stats on their students. nurses take stats on their patients - even patients as important as the president of the united states. what's wrong with a nursing student asking for relevant stats on oregon nursing programs in order to make informed personal, finacial, and academic decisions - in the interest of finding a better fit?
.................................................. .................................
for itt's costs: i calculate
oportunity costs, not just the price tag. i factor in program odds, and personal costs. i don't have easy access to hard numbers. i guess, and gather info from students in the program:
1) 2-3 years in pre-reques
2) waiting 1-2 years wait to apply and get into a program
3) rough statistical probability of getting bumped out of a program, and having to wait 1 or more years or more to re-apply to other programs and start over - minimum 4 to 6 years before rn licensing.
4) income lost, due to years of delayed entry to the job market as an rn. each year of delay, constitutes a full salary of lost income.
5) risk comfort level
... for me, itt
is the
lower cost. and lower risk of failing. i believe itt can also do a better job of teaching me how to be a nurse, because they fit my learning style....i believe the job market will open up in 2013 - 2014. it won't matter as much at that time where my degree is from. there will be jobs for everyone. i'm willing to take the risk.
given 5 to 7 years to get through a 2 year nursing degree in ocne, and 2.25 years for itt - the oportunity cost of years working is ~ 4 times the annual salary of a starting rn. (the salary should go up, after 2 years experience.)
to me -not everyone - ocne represents a loss of 4 years of work as an rn at approx $40,000/year. roughly ~ $160,000 to $200,000+? toward the
oportunity cost to take the longer, ocne route -
and ocne has a higher probability of failure, just because ocne, finds value in making it difficult to learn, just for the sake of making things difficult. same basic material, different phylosophies of learning.
subtract the $24,000 to $20,000 for an ocne adn from the $30,000 for itt's program (credits transfered in). this gives an added up-front cost of $6,000 to $10,000 to go to itt. i'd be able to work ~ 4 years earlier and make ~$150,000+
added income on the back-end - and the probability of
success is higher with itt. it 's very rough, and not precise. no matter how it is adjusted - itt is a much, much
lower long-term cost.
from my perspective - maybe not for others - not only do the costs fall in favor of itt, so does the level of risks. as an ocne student, the chances of realizing any real gain from association with ohsu by being in ocne, is very, very low maybe not even 6% - maybe 2%? so, i can't see investing a high level of risk, more than half of a decade, and
any money, for single digit chances at success and the loss of four years of income.
given i go on for an msn or bsn earlier via the itt route, -the total net savings would increase. i already have two business degrees, add foreign language skills - i should be marketable.
it won't pencil out the same for others. itt will not be the best bet for
everyone, but it is for me.
.................................................. ...............................................
did i read that post above correctly? "entrance in (two year) nursing programs, should be as difficult as entrance to md programs." an md is a doctorate. work more, to
achieve less? is somebody going to be handing out doctorates at the adn and asn graduations? nurses are making goals, to make
anything more difficult, and with difficulty being the main desired end? ...hmmmmm.... i don't see the advanatages here....is ocne the only one doing this?