Re: ANA & ONA Originally Posted by LinfieldNursingGuy
That is exactly my point. They have supported it for decades but have done little to move it forward. Perhaps the should have a more aggressive stance on the BSN requirement.
I'm still not sure what you think these organizations should do. They are voluntary professional associations, not regulatory boards, accrediting organizations, etc. They don't have any power to
make anyone in nursing do what they want -- in fact, only a very
tiny percentage of US nurses (I don't recall exactly, but it's in the single digits -- 6%?) belong to the ANA/state NAs. The ANA has aggressively promoted this position for several decades now (which is one of the reasons many nurses won't join!), but they haven't convinced anywhere
near the majority of US nurses or more than one state legislature (North Dakota, which passed a BSN-minimum requirement but rescinded it several years later). The BSN-as-entry-level concept is
highly controversial, and just doesn't have much support across the board (I'm not saying that's a good thing or a bad thing, just that
that's the way it is).
Nursing News