ineffective management of therapeutic regimen diagnosis for a diabetic

Nursing Students Student Assist

Published

[TABLE]

[TR]

[TD]

Need to know if this care plan looks good so far and if I am on the right track, doing it on and older adult, feedback is much appreciated thank you

[TABLE]

[TR]

[TD]

Assessment

- Desire to learn how to improve health

- Limited knowledge of illness, and medications

- Takes medication when home health aides provides it

- Highest education completed middle school

- Snacks on cookies and cakes, lack of vegetable and fruit in diet

- Hypertension

- Hx of diabetes

- High cholesterol

- Not wearing proper foot care

-

[/TD]

[TD]Potential Nursing Diagnosis

- Risk for Ineffective management of therapeutic regimen

- Ineffective management of therapeutic regimen

R/T insufficient knowledge of condition, medications, proper diet, self-monitoring glucose/blood pressure, foot care

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD=colspan: 2]Planning: Patient Goals and Expected Outcomes

* Client will identify medications used for symptom control for diabetes, hypertension, cholesterol as measured by verbalization of accurate knowledge by end of the month

* Client will understand how to incorporate new health regimens into lifestyle such as hearth healthy diet and diabetes exchange diet by verbalization which foods are appropriate to eat

[/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

[/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

Specializes in Critical Care, ED, Cath lab, CTPAC,Trauma.

Looks ok with the information your provided...is it good for your patient? There is not enough data provided to help you.

Care plans are all about patient assessment and what the patient needs. what semester are you?

There is no such nursing diagnosis as "Risk for Ineffective management of therapeutic regimen" or "Ineffective management of therapeutic regimen" in the NANDA-I 2012-2014, which is the only definitive work for nursing diagnosis. You can't just make this stuff up, even if it sounds reasonable.

I do find "Ineffective self-health management" (p. 161), "Readiness for enhanced self-health management,: (p. 164), and "Ineffective family therapeutic regimen management," (page 167). I also observe on p. 491 that a prior nursing diagnosis, "Effective therapeutic regimen management" was removed from the list of approved diagnoses in the 2009-2011 edition, for "Lack of related factors, and needed to be updated to reflect the current level of scientific knowledge."

There is no magic list of medical diagnoses from which you can derive nursing diagnoses. There is no one from column A, one from column B list out there. Nursing diagnosis does NOT result from medical diagnosis, period. This is one of the most difficult concepts for some nursing students to incorporate into their understanding of what nursing is, which is why I strive to think of multiple ways to say it. Yes, nursing is legally obligated to implement some aspects of the medical plan of care. (Other disciplines may implement other parts, like radiology, or therapy, or ...) That is not to say that everything nursing assesses, is, and does is part of the medical plan of care. It is not. That's where nursing dx comes in.

A nursing diagnosis statement translated into regular English goes something like this: "I think my patient has ____(nursing diagnosis)_____ . I know this because I see/assessed/found in the chart (as evidenced by) __(defining characteristics) ________________. He has this because he has ___(related factor(s))__."

"Related to" means "caused by," not something else. In many nursing diagnoses it is perfectly acceptable to use a medical diagnosis as a causative factor. For example, "acute pain" includes as related factors "Injury agents: e.g. (which means, "for example") biological, chemical, physical, psychological." "Surgery" counts for a physical injury-- after all, it's only expensive trauma. :)

To make a nursing diagnosis, you must be able to demonstrate at least one "defining characteristic" and related (causative) factor. (Exceptions: "Risk for..." diagnoses do not have defining characteristics, they have risk factors.) Defining characteristics and related factors for all approved nursing diagnoses are found in the NANDA-I 2012-2014 (current edition). $29 paperback, $23 for your Kindle or iPad at Amazon, free 2-day delivery for students. NEVER make an error about this again---and, as a bonus, be able to defend appropriate use of medical diagnoses as related factors to your faculty. Won't they be surprised!

I know that many people (and even some faculty, who should know better) think that a "care plan handbook" will take the place of this book. However, all nursing diagnoses, to be valid, must come from NANDA-I. The care plan books use them, but because NANDA-I understandably doesn't want to give blanket reprint permission to everybody who writes a care plan handbook, the info in the handbooks is incomplete. We see the results here all the time from students who are not clear on what criteria make for a valid defining characteristic and what make for a valid cause.Yes, we have to know a lot about medical diagnoses and physiology, you betcha we do. But we also need to know about NURSING, which is not subservient or of lesser importance, and is what you are in school for.

If you do not have the NANDA-I 2012-2014, you are cheating yourself out of the best reference for this you could have. I don't care if your faculty forgot to put it on the reading list. Get it now. When you get it out of the box, first put little sticky tabs on the sections:

1, health promotion (teaching, immunization....)

2, nutrition (ingestion, metabolism, hydration....)

3, elimination and exchange (this is where you'll find bowel, bladder, renal, pulmonary...)

4, activity and rest (sleep, activity/exercise, cardiovascular and pulmonary tolerance, self-care and neglect...)

5, perception and cognition (attention, orientation, cognition, communication...)

6, self-perception (hopelessness, loneliness, self-esteem, body image...)

7, role (family relationships, parenting, social interaction...)

8, sexuality (dysfunction, ineffective pattern, reproduction, childbearing process, maternal-fetal dyad...)

9, coping and stress (post-trauma responses, coping responses, anxiety, denial, grief, powerlessness, sorrow...)

10, life principles (hope, spiritual, decisional conflict, nonadherence...)

11, safety (this is where you'll find your wound stuff, shock, infection, tissue integrity, dry eye, positioning injury, SIDS, trauma, violence, self mutilization...)

12, comfort (physical, environmental, social...)

13, growth and development (disproportionate, delayed...)

Now, if you are ever again tempted to make a diagnosis first and cram facts into it second, at least go to the section where you think your diagnosis may lie and look at the table of contents at the beginning of it. Something look tempting? Look it up and see if the defining characteristics match your assessment findings. If so... there's a match. If not... keep looking. Eventually you will find it easier to do it the other way.

Specializes in Critical Care, ED, Cath lab, CTPAC,Trauma.

They mean the title of the thread is the nursing diagnosis?

I just don't understand why schools aren't govong the information to the students? They are not teaching them...:no:

Beats heck outta me. Of course, I live and breathe nursing dx in my work (I got an actual NANDA-I tee shirt!), and hey, maybe nursing faculty don't. Scary, huh?

Specializes in Critical Care, ED, Cath lab, CTPAC,Trauma.

.....very.

+ Add a Comment