Re: No Case Against Nurses in Katrina Deaths Originally Posted by sonnyluv
let me ask you a question, in the instance that you sited as your example of precedent, should the nurse have been prosecuted? Is there such thing as a sentinel medication error so severe that it warrants criminal prosecution?
But in this instance, we are talking about "mercy killing". What would have been more criminal, to let those patients starve to death and eventually collapse or to as gently as possible end their lives. Either outcome could be prosecuted by a desperate enough attorney.
Thanks for the info, though!
sunnyluv,
You raise an interesting point. The difference in these 2 cases is that the nurses prosecuted for the med error that caused the death of the infant were not alleged to have acted intentionally, while those in the Katrina case were accused of deliberately taking the lives of their patients.
In my opinion (for what it is worth), it is wrong to prosecute nurses (or any healthcare professionals) for accidental mistakes. I don't see the benefit to society of locking up well-meaning professionals who make mistakes, regardless of the outcome of those mistakes. I'm not making light of the death of a patient, but society can be protected from the actions of these professionals by simply taking their licenses away. And the families of patients harmed by medical mistakes have the civil courts available to them to recover monetary damages.
If a healthcare professional has CLEARLY acted deliberately to harm a patient, then I agree that criminal charges may be warranted in order to protect society from this person's possible future actions. (As in the Charles Cullen case.) However, in the Katrina case, I think that it is far from clear that the nurses and doctors did anything wrong.
Nursing News