Re: LA Times - Problem nurses stay on the job as patients suffer
What frustrates me about this article more than anything is the press and the public opinion of nursing that this writer brings about with his article.
Considering the public's idea of nursing comes from Grey's Anatomy, Scrubs, and now Nurse Jackie, the last thing we need is bad press. Yes, there are bad apples in any industry, but to single out nursing frustrates me. By and large there are so many amazing people who are so under-appreciated for the amount of work they do and the knowledge they have. This article reinforces the image of nurses as sadistic and drug-abusing people who weren't smart enough to become doctors, when WE all know it's not that way.
Yes, I'm a California RN, and by all means, I think that those abusive people should have their licenses revoked, yesterday. But to write an article about it when we already have less-than-stellar press frustrates me.
Our BRN has been totally re-invented now, in part because of the ripples that article caused, which may have the desired effect of making the BRN act more quickly (I think not being furloughed a few days a month might also help, as well as having a state budget for the BRN...).
What worries me is what other ripples may come from that article, as far as public perception goes. I know so many intelligent, awesome nurses who truly care for their patients and do their very best every day.
Where is the article about them? Where is the article about the top 10% of nurses?
Where is the article that discusses all the physiological, pharmacological, psychological knowledge and just plain love we bring with us to work every day?
That's my question.
End soapbox.
Nursing News