Re: Katrina: Memorial Hospital Patient Deaths Originally Posted by C-DIFF PHIL RN
again just speaking as someone who came pretty close to getting his dumbass blown away and saw what was going one. man vs nature..man always will lose. but sitting there saying the president displayed a clear lack of concern sounds a bit political to me. i very sure any president (obama, bush or anyother) that the american people elected who just had a class 5 hurricane strike a city will be concerened. also i think many people have a false idea of the limitations and capabilities that the govt can do in dealing with a disaster such as this. people say planning is everything but then again execution of that plan is a whole different animal.
You're incorrect - Katrina made landfall as a Category THREE, not a five, with maximum sustained winds of 125 miles an hour. She made landfall first in Florida as a tropical storm, then reintensified over the warm watered Loop Current in the Gulf, hit Cat 5 status again for a brief period, then slammed into the Gulf Coast of Louisiana as a Cat 3 (some do say a four, but that seems to be based more on the speed of recorded gusts at landfall and not on sustained power), jumped the sound as she weakened and backtracked slightly, and then made a third landfall at Cat three intensity with winds of 117 mph sustained on the MS/LA border. She then weakened further, bounced across and up the central US and caused flash flooding and all sorts of tornadoes on her way, before finally dying as an extratropical system somewhere between the Great Lakes and Canada.
In the Saffir-Simpson scale, a Cat five has sustained winds of 155 mph or greater.
Only THREE Cat 5s have ever hit the US: Andrew in 1992, Camille in 1969, and the so-called Labor Day hurricane of 1935 in the Florida Keys. There is speculation on the Galveston hurricane of 1900, but it is believed that storm was actually a Cat 4, with its winds estimated at 134 mph.
Katrina did not make landfall as a Cat 5 (and thank God she didn't - if she had, rebuilding New Orleans would be moot because New Orleans would now be UNDER the Gulf of Mexico). Of the known storms to ever hit Cat 5 status (there have been something like 23 since records have been kept) only eight have ever hit land as Cat 5s, and only three of them have been in the US.
Hurricane Camille was the strongest storm EVER to hit the US mainland; she roared into the Gulf Coast of Mississippi with an unprecedented - and since unrepeated - 200 mph+ wind gusts, with sustained winds in excess of 180 to 190 mph. Katrina KILLED more d/t flooding, but Camille was more powerful (and feel free to look that up:
http://www.geocities.com/hurricanene...anecamille.htm - I checked my facts first). IMMEDIATELY after Camille Nixon sent in the National Guard and martial law was declared.
So in comparison, Bush didn't do a darned thing.
I'm a huge hurricane buff/weather freak. Weird, yes, but the power of nature fascinates me.
Note - Katrina isn't even the deadliest. That dubious honor goes to the 1900 Galveston storm. Officially, records record six thousand dead, but it is believed that that number is grossly inaccurate and may be closer to an unreal TWELVE thousand. Katrina is the third deadliest with 1800 dead recorded, and there was one I believe in 1928 in Okechobee, FL that killed about 6000 that is generally given second place (dis)honors.
New Orleans is just a huge bowl that Katrina basically filled with water - its center is below sea level and its edges are only something like twenty feet above sea level. So when the levies failed, New Orleans filled - and the water had no place to go.
Back to the thread, and I am sorry about the hijack.
Nursing News