Tying Patient Satisfaction to Medicare Reimbursement is Problematic

Patient satisfaction surveys are important in helping the healthcare facility to harvest data, discover perceptions of the care being rendered, and gather suggestions on how to improve. Since patient satisfaction surveys consist of subjective data instead of objective metrics, the responses should not be tied to Medicare reimbursement rates. Nurses Safety Article

Patient satisfaction surveys have been receiving an amplified amount of attention at hospitals and other types of healthcare facilities, especially since the results of these reviews now have a significant effect on Medicare reimbursement.

Valuable information can be gleaned from the comments and feedback that patients provide when they fill out and return the surveys to the facilities where they previously received care. In addition, patient feedback is a remarkably important tool that helps the healthcare facility to harvest data, discover perceptions of the care being rendered, and gather suggestions on how to improve.

Still, patient satisfaction surveys are not exactly free from problems. In fact, patient satisfaction surveys are problematic for several reasons.

First of all, the results of these patient satisfaction surveys are entirely subjective and do not always reflect the quality of the care that clinicians are delivering. For instance, many of the most poorly rated facilities have some of the best patient outcomes, including lower than average death rates, low readmission rates, and a minimal number of hospital-acquired infections. Good facilities and skilled healthcare workers are two of the main ingredients that make favorable patient outcomes possible, but a handful of nitpicky patients can destroy one hospital's overall patient satisfaction rating by returning surveys where they've responded to every single question with 'one.' A survey score of 'one' translates to 'very poor' care, even though the patient who returned these dismal responses actually might have had an excellent outcome that was free of complications.

On the other hand, many of the most favorably rated facilities have some of the worst patient outcomes, including higher than average patient death rates. A USA TODAY analysis of more than 4,600 U.S. hospitals has found that 120 of those most highly rated by patients have higher than average death rates for heart attack, heart failure or pneumonia (USA TODAY, 2011). However, a patient's perception is his reality, so he will return a survey with appreciative responses to every single question if the care was perceived as being good, even if the inpatient stay is taking place at a hospital with a high percentage of poor outcomes.

Secondly, the corporations that formulate patient satisfaction surveys are exploiting hospital administrators' hopes of using the ratings to market their facilities. One national chain of cancer treatment hospitals regularly uses expensive airtime to broadcast television commercials. The narrator of their TV commercials never fails to mention that "our facilities have an overall 95 percent patient satisfaction rating!" Countless hospitals across the US have resorted to providing customer service measures that sometimes detract from effective patient care as an attempt to alter perceptions and raise patient satisfaction survey scores. Many overworked nurses are spending increasing amounts of time on activities such as the recital of phony scripted phrases and the constant fetching of snacks, sodas, chairs and cots to keep clients happy.

Finally, patient satisfaction surveys can unfairly generate positive ratings for mediocre doctors and bring about poor ratings for highly competent physicians. The physician who coddles the most demanding patients, submits to their unrealistic requests, gives them everything they desire and never says "no" will receive high ratings. In contrast, the doctor who sets realistic limits with patients and says "no" to improper medical care or unnecessary prescriptions will be rated unfavorably. A growing number of patients will be unhappy if they do not get what they want out of their clinicians, even if they do not need the things they are requesting.

Patient satisfaction surveys have their place in the realm of healthcare because the opinions of the people to whom we provide care are essential. However, the surveys are based on subjective perceptions instead of objective metrics such as infection rates and patient outcomes. In view of the fact that patient satisfaction surveys consist of subjective data, the responses should not be tied to Medicare reimbursement rates.

RESOURCES

USA TODAY Publishes Analysis of Death Rates at More Than 4,600 U.S. Hospitals. (August 2011). usatoday.com. Retrieved March 7, 2013, from About USA TODAY

brilliant observaton!! this is the most ridiculous thing that has ever been implemented! In the 20 years of nursing, I have never EVER thought I would see the day that our "job performance" per "customer satisfaction". I don't even want to be a nurse anymore....it's no longer fun, it's no longer about pt care, rather more and more time spent documenting that "core measures" were met and less time actually interacting with your patients. Then, as a result of this overextensive documentation, we get slammed by the patients for "sitting in front of the computer" and "running us through like cattle". we can't win.

in my heart of hearts, I feel as if this is just another avenue to socialized medicine and total governmental control.

Specializes in NICU, PICU, Transport, L&D, Hospice.
in my heart of hearts, I feel as if this is just another avenue to socialized medicine and total governmental control.

I am an advocate of single payer health care in the USA where the pursuit of profit is taken out of the basic delivery of necessary care. In that world, presumably, outcomes would matter as much and perhaps more than patient 'satisfaction'.

Patient satisfaction is very important. If the patient is satisfied with your hospital, he will recommend others. Good quality of care is important factor to be considered.

Specializes in Case mgmt., rehab, (CRRN), LTC & psych.
Patient satisfaction is very important. If the patient is satisfied with your hospital, he will recommend others. Good quality of care is important factor to be considered.
I can totally understand and appreciate this. Thank you for your input!
Specializes in Specializes in L/D, newborn, GYN, LTC, Dialysis.
Patient satisfaction is very important. If the patient is satisfied with your hospital, he will recommend others. Good quality of care is important factor to be considered.

I don't think anyone here disputes that.

Your article is a fair synopsis of a book I published in 2012. The bottom line is healthcare, the ONLY industry dedicated to helping others, has been taken down the wrong track by outsiders and healthcare administrators/pundits are looking the other way. I would appreciate any comments you have. Thanks.

Patient satisfaction is very important. If the patient is satisfied with your hospital, he will recommend others. Good quality of care is important factor to be considered.

That comment is no more than fear-mongering unproven theory and what I call drinking the kool-aide provided by healthcare administrators/pundits. Patients will go to either the nearest facility or a facility they are familiar with. Anecdotal of course, but nonetheless very common. Ask anyone in an emergency department the number of times patients have passed other facilities only to state, "This was the only place I knew." Or the number of "frequent flyers" who return regardless of past experience. Again, anecdotal but at some point accumulated anecdotal becomes fact, despite administrators/pundits brushing it off.

The above quoted kool-aide is no different than another favorite flavored kool-aide of healthcare administrators/pundits, "Healthcare workers with the most patient complaints are sued the most." Although a fact, what is left out is how many of those less favored (most complained about) are found liable versus litigation against those with the least number of patient complaints (most favored). In the same manner, what are the number of sentinel events of the least favored versus most favored healthcare workers? Some will say, apples and oranges. I say, all fruit. More important, food for thought. An added caveat: Kool-aide is not a well balanced diet. Just my two sense [sic].

I don't think anyone here disputes that.

I DO(!) dispute that. And say to healthcare workers all the time, "Do NOT drink the kool-aide." No one has a patient's best interest in mind, to include over the patient, other than the healthcare worker giving care to that patient.

My wife once had a complaint called into the office after she did a home visit. The complaint was that "the nurse didn't hoover the carpets". Seriously, the patient's spouse expected the hospice nurse to clean up the house as part of a visit. noway.gif

Wow. That is crazy

Specializes in Pediatrics, Emergency, Trauma.