Tying Patient Satisfaction to Medicare Reimbursement is Problematic

Patient satisfaction surveys are important in helping the healthcare facility to harvest data, discover perceptions of the care being rendered, and gather suggestions on how to improve. Since patient satisfaction surveys consist of subjective data instead of objective metrics, the responses should not be tied to Medicare reimbursement rates. Nurses Safety Article

Patient satisfaction surveys have been receiving an amplified amount of attention at hospitals and other types of healthcare facilities, especially since the results of these reviews now have a significant effect on Medicare reimbursement.

Valuable information can be gleaned from the comments and feedback that patients provide when they fill out and return the surveys to the facilities where they previously received care. In addition, patient feedback is a remarkably important tool that helps the healthcare facility to harvest data, discover perceptions of the care being rendered, and gather suggestions on how to improve.

Still, patient satisfaction surveys are not exactly free from problems. In fact, patient satisfaction surveys are problematic for several reasons.

First of all, the results of these patient satisfaction surveys are entirely subjective and do not always reflect the quality of the care that clinicians are delivering. For instance, many of the most poorly rated facilities have some of the best patient outcomes, including lower than average death rates, low readmission rates, and a minimal number of hospital-acquired infections. Good facilities and skilled healthcare workers are two of the main ingredients that make favorable patient outcomes possible, but a handful of nitpicky patients can destroy one hospital's overall patient satisfaction rating by returning surveys where they've responded to every single question with 'one.' A survey score of 'one' translates to 'very poor' care, even though the patient who returned these dismal responses actually might have had an excellent outcome that was free of complications.

On the other hand, many of the most favorably rated facilities have some of the worst patient outcomes, including higher than average patient death rates. A USA TODAY analysis of more than 4,600 U.S. hospitals has found that 120 of those most highly rated by patients have higher than average death rates for heart attack, heart failure or pneumonia (USA TODAY, 2011). However, a patient's perception is his reality, so he will return a survey with appreciative responses to every single question if the care was perceived as being good, even if the inpatient stay is taking place at a hospital with a high percentage of poor outcomes.

Secondly, the corporations that formulate patient satisfaction surveys are exploiting hospital administrators' hopes of using the ratings to market their facilities. One national chain of cancer treatment hospitals regularly uses expensive airtime to broadcast television commercials. The narrator of their TV commercials never fails to mention that "our facilities have an overall 95 percent patient satisfaction rating!" Countless hospitals across the US have resorted to providing customer service measures that sometimes detract from effective patient care as an attempt to alter perceptions and raise patient satisfaction survey scores. Many overworked nurses are spending increasing amounts of time on activities such as the recital of phony scripted phrases and the constant fetching of snacks, sodas, chairs and cots to keep clients happy.

Finally, patient satisfaction surveys can unfairly generate positive ratings for mediocre doctors and bring about poor ratings for highly competent physicians. The physician who coddles the most demanding patients, submits to their unrealistic requests, gives them everything they desire and never says "no" will receive high ratings. In contrast, the doctor who sets realistic limits with patients and says "no" to improper medical care or unnecessary prescriptions will be rated unfavorably. A growing number of patients will be unhappy if they do not get what they want out of their clinicians, even if they do not need the things they are requesting.

Patient satisfaction surveys have their place in the realm of healthcare because the opinions of the people to whom we provide care are essential. However, the surveys are based on subjective perceptions instead of objective metrics such as infection rates and patient outcomes. In view of the fact that patient satisfaction surveys consist of subjective data, the responses should not be tied to Medicare reimbursement rates.

RESOURCES

USA TODAY Publishes Analysis of Death Rates at More Than 4,600 U.S. Hospitals. (August 2011). usatoday.com. Retrieved March 7, 2013, from About USA TODAY

Specializes in Case mgmt., rehab, (CRRN), LTC & psych.
So, these community hospitals will close their doors, creating a more compounding effect on rural healthcare. Who comes up with this crap?
Bureaucrats who do not work on the front lines of healthcare are the ones who conjure up this crap. And you came up with the correct word: CRAP.
Specializes in PACU, ED.

After all, should I care that my surgery went well or that the medicine team chose the right abx to help cure my infection? No, what I really care about according to CMS is

  • During this hospital stay, how often did doctors treat you with courtesy and respect?
  • During this hospital stay, how often did doctors listen carefully to you?
  • During this hospital stay, how often did doctors explain things in a way you could understand?

That's right doc, just give me a hug and listen to me and CMS will reward you or at least not dock your pay. This blog post points out an unintended consequence. The boutique hospitals will get bonus payments while the safety net hospitals get penalized.

How Obamacare penalizes safety net hospitals

I was talking with a couple of physician friends recently. They have metrics to meet regarding the percentage of their DMII patients with good A1C. The dilemma they have is what to do with patients who refuse to take their insulin and therefore continue to have high A1C values. Should the providers make home visits to personally give the morning insulin, should they discharge these patients from their practice, or should the providers accept financial penalties for continuing to treat these patients?

Specializes in PCCN.

^^^ I feel you should write an editorial to a local paper on that one- it makes complete sense.

I'm sure most everyone is happy that they had a good outcome as opposed to the red carpet service.

I still think it's an ulterior (sp?) motive to get out of paying. why this stuff is based on froo froo stuff ,- it is unrealistic to think that the perfect doctor/nurse with the perfect bedside manner with the perfect outcomes , exists

Bureaucrats who do not work on the front lines of healthcare are the ones who conjure up this crap. And you came up with the correct word: CRAP.

Who comes up with this?

From President Obama's 2013 State of the Union address:

"We’ll bring down costs by changing the way our government pays for Medicare, because our medical bills shouldn’t be based on the number of tests ordered or days spent in the hospital. They should be based on the quality of care that our seniors receive."

Really, Mr. President? So should my bill at Applebee's not reflect how much food I ordered or how many Mucho Margaritas I consumed but rather how much I enjoyed my meal and if it was served with a smile? ********.

http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-02-12/politics/37059380_1_applause-task-free-enterprise/2

Specializes in ED.

Excellent Point, hospitals are not hotels and we don't have 24 room service!

Who comes up with this?

From President Obama's 2013 State of the Union address:

"We’ll bring down costs by changing the way our government pays for Medicare, because our medical bills shouldn’t be based on the number of tests ordered or days spent in the hospital. They should be based on the quality of care that our seniors receive."

Really, Mr. President? So should my bill at Applebee's not reflect how much food I ordered or how many Mucho Margaritas I consumed but rather how much I enjoyed my meal and if it was served with a smile? ********.

State of the Union 2013: President Obama?s address to Congress (Transcript) - Page 2 - Washington Post

Considering this came through the pipelines LONG before January 2013 (and before PPACA for that matter) I don't think we can blame the president for this. And considering he said "quality of care" not quality of service, not sure how that applies anyway...

Amen to that. What the patient wants is not always what is best. If they had the ability and knowledge to take care of themselves, they wouldn't be in the hospital. Not to say that we should ignore their requests entirely, but sometimes they need to be encouraged to make healthier choices.

Specializes in Registered Nurse.

Who should determine what quality care is? I work in an area of nursing regulated by medicare goals and payment based on patient quality outcomes. Obtaining quality care or outcomes is related to patient choice. Also the patient's economic means impacts their success at obtaining the outcomes. Patient's who are worried about basic needs such as food and shelter, tend not to worry about long term consequences of not following through with prescribed medical treatment. Why should the hospital be penalized for a poorly controlled diabetic with numerous admissions throughout the year due to infected wounds and out of control glucose levels?

Specializes in PICU, NICU, L&D, Public Health, Hospice.

Hospitals should be part of a larger health care system for a community.

The continuum of care and health within that community is both a shared endeavor and responsibility.

Poor communities with few resources to assist the disadvantaged will have poorer health outcomes for patients mentioned by Marisette.

How do we fix these problems??

Specializes in PACU, ED.

Good question tewdles.

I think encouraging people to make healthy choices and educating them on the results of poor choices may be the best way to improve the overall health of our society. We need to make people feel empowered to guide their own lives. I like some of the "in your face" kind of advertisements to show people the seriousness of ignoring DM, HTN, or PVD.

Here's a thought, instead of penalizing health care providers for patients who don't meet metrics why not re-direct the financial incentive to the patients? I used to work for a company that gave us a substantial insurance premium discount for not using tobacco. Incentives could be given for maintaining a health BP, a1c, % bodyfat (I hate BMI).

Penalizing health care providers just seems counterproductive to me.

I have often wondered just who came up with these surveys and questions, and would like to know how many times have they followed a nurse on their shift to see for themselves what we all have to do to take and give good care to our patients. How can they be the ones who determine what is or is not good care, and I really need someone to explain to me just how it became the nurse's responsibility to make sure the patient understand their diagnosis and every aspect of it as it relates to their health and outcomes to be achieved? What happened to the doctor's responsibility to the patients to explain all the tests that are ordered and why they are important to knowing how to treat the patient correctly?

It is always been left up to the nurse to "teach" the patient what they need to know to prevent additional hospital readmissions, what medications they are taking and why, what medicines they are to stop taking, what exercises or activities they need to start or decrease and why. What happened to the other departments in the hospital that should be teaching the patient about oxygen at home, how to use incentive spirometers, and why, what diets they are to follow relating to diagnosis and why it is important to their health; how to use crutches, walkers, do ADLS, etc? It always fall to nurses to do all the education in addition to providing safe and reasonable care during their hospital stay.

Don't let us forget the importance of "wording scripted" phrases to re-enforce to the patient/family that we are only to happy to be given them "excellent" care and that we have the time to be at their beck & call for anything regardless of whatever else our day might include. Please don"t forget the 5 "P" when you go into that room every 1-2hrs to see if they require anything. and close the door for "Privacy"

I just wish that someone from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation would come and follow me around for 12+ hrs and see how easy it is to do all they require done for the patient(regardless of how many patients you have assigned to you) and have to do for each patient under your care for that shift, then have them to do it and let me critique them on how well the accomplished the set tasks for each, and don't forget all the charting and everything else a nurse has to do.

How long do you think one of them would last? How long do you think your Nurse Manage could make it doing your job? My manage does not know just what all a staff nurse must do, and is constantly on us to improve our scores!

Sorry about going on so long but this is just something that grips my a## when I am the one that spent all those long hours obtaining my nursing degree and now everytime you get 1 negative comment, whether or not it has merit, you get wrote up because the patient ( or should i say the customer) is always right

Astute as always, Commuter. I had a patient just the other day who had one of the most experienced nurses on out unit but wasn't happy with her. Why? Because this nurse does not coddle and is very matter-of-fact. She is the first to notice a change in condition and to meet that change with the appropriate intervention but this patient felt she wasn't empathetic enough.

It's a sad day when experience and excellent care mean less than remembering no ice in the water and extra snacks. I could go on...

Exactly. We, as nurses, are often more clinically oriented, especially in critical situations. This means we often do not have time to hold the patient's hand and say, "it'll be OK" (or similar). Too often, the patients put our work secondary to the customer service stuff and will respond with a lousy Press Ganey (Press Whiney?) because of one small and inconsequential thing they choose to nitpick. Some even turn in a bad review because they were not allowed to smoke (or do other harmful things) in the hospital.

Yes tying surveys and reimbursement based on a government standard is a problem (not an "issue"), and it is only the beginning.