Death With Dignity? - page 4
What happened to this concept? I am NOT advocating euthanasia. I am however advocating that we take a close look at what we are currently participating in when we keep chronically ill, multi... Read More
Nov 19, '00Bunky: I just this morning discovered this conversation. Pain management both chronic and dying are special interests of mine. Twenty years of dealing with families and doctors have just made me more determined, but it's one step forward, two steps back as the governing agencies become increasingly paranoid about addiction. We must remember that MOST medical students are quite young and, let's face it, impressionable. By the time they become licensed physicians they have a lot of theory but very few have any real life experience. And they would be the last to admit to that. I have worked with some MDs who had understanding and compassion and, of course, I have had my share of those other ones. The good ones have outweighed the bad, but when we have one patient that has to suffer, it leaves an indelible impression. I don't work in the ER because of the predominant focus on "saving" everyone who comes in the door. In my experience, patients who are in pain have great difficulty in dying; pain is a stimulant. As someone mentioned previously, once a level of comfort is achieved, patients can relax and let go. I don't worry about being accused of overdosing as long as respirations are not <12. Difficult when they're Cheyne Stoking. Just a couple of things I wanted to add here which I'm sure you know, but I haven't seen mentioned along with the inability to swallow: Any oral medication can be given rectally, and sometimes it works even better. Most docs will okay this if you finesse them. About patients drowning in their own juices - I think we can get Scopalamine patches again - really effective in drying out those lungs and as a secondary benefit deals with nausea. I could write a book on this (and I may). Remember allthe things that we do in the face of adversity to make those last moments a tiny bit easier.
Dec 22, '00Originally posted by bunky:
What happened to this concept? I am NOT advocating euthanasia. I am however advocating that we take a close look at what we are currently participating in when we keep chronically ill, multi problem, end stage patients in a hospital without any hope of improving their quality of life many times doing more to add to the suffering of their death than to the quality of their life. Is anyone else out their seeing this? What have we accomplished when we admit an elderly person whose life consists of lying in a bed, unable to speak or respond to anything but painful stimuli with more than a blink? Unable to eat, or drink or sustain themselves in any way except breathing. Their quality of life is not one that any of us would wish to live. If you asked the family, I feel certain that they'd agree that they themselves would not like to be in this condition either. What are we accomplishing when we care for these patients beyond comfort care? I have to stress that I myself could not EVER administer a medication that would end a life. I couldn't live with myself. But what I am speaking of is not even about witholding basic life sustaining treatment such as IV fluids. It is the pervasive practice of sending these people for invasive procedures even surgeries, inserting tubes in every orifice, and subjecting them to blood test after blood test as though we are looking at curing them when we know it is not possible to do so. More importantly what do you feel is the motivation for this prolongation of a death? Is it all the family? If so, do you think it is an uniformed choice made by the family or a display of too much trust in medicine? Is it the physician? Where do we as nurses fit in this familiar picture?
I am very interested in what everyone else has to say on this subject, and if any one else has a problem with seeing this like I do.