Re: Grading System Recommendations Originally Posted by llg 
I'm curious, VickieRN. Why did you suggest that particular allocation? Why remove the requirement to write a paper?
I don't think there is "one ideal formula." It all depends on the nature of the class, the course objectives, the assignments, etc. For example, in a course that I teach, the paper is VERY important in that it provides the students with the opportunity to demonstrate that they can "put it altogether." So, it counts 30% of the total. I also don't see the need for a comprehensive final exam in the course ... so, I just give a series of quizzes throughout the semester that count for 40%. Then I have some other project that count for the remaining 30%.
The grading scheme varies ....
This is the allocation for my Nursing Gerontology class. I have experimented with the allocation over the past 2 semesters and I like this particular formulation. I agree that there is not one "size fits all." Allocations depend on the particulars of a class, such as number of students enrolled, and faculty resources. The reason there is no paper in my class is simply this: ~ 130 students enrolled, and I am the only faculty person teaching this course. I would be the only one grading all these papers!!!
It would be great if this class could be broken down into several sections, with more than one faculty person teaching. That way, other active learning strategies could be employed such as case studies, group presentations, synthesis papers, etc. It would be nice if a service learning requirement could also be tacked on (such as visiting a hospice center, volunteering at a nursing home or assisted living facility). However, state monies are tight and in my college of nursing all non-writing intensive classes past the 1st semester are being consolidated into one huge section.
Grading System Recommendations
Search Tags
Nursing News