Regulation Proposed to Help Protect Health Care Providers from Discrimination

A new proposed regulation would increase awareness of, and compliance with, three separate laws protecting federally funded health care providers’ right of conscience. This proposed rule was placed on public display at the Federal Register today by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).“This proposed regulation is about the legal right of a health care professional to practice according to their conscience,” HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt said. “Doctors and other health care providers should not be forced to choose between good professional standing and violating their conscience. Freedom of expression and action should not be surrendered upon the issuance of a health care degree.”
Over the past three decades, Congress has enacted several statutes to safeguard these freedoms, also known as provider conscience rights, and the proposed regulation would increase awareness of and compliance with these laws. Specifically, the proposed rule would:

• Clarify that non-discrimination protections apply to institutional health care providers as well as to individual employees working for recipients of certain funds from HHS;
• Require recipients of certain HHS funds to certify their compliance with laws protecting provider conscience rights;
• Designate the HHS Office for Civil Rights as the entity to receive complaints of discrimination addressed by the existing statutes and the proposed regulation; and
• Charge HHS officials to work with any state or local government or entity that may be in violation of existing statutes and the proposed regulation to encourage voluntary steps to bring that government or entity into compliance with the law. If, despite the Department’s efforts, compliance is not achieved, HHS officials will consider all legal options, including termination of funding and the return of funds paid out in violation of the nondiscrimination provisions.

Heh.

If you don't want to perform an abortion, you don't accept a job where such a thing is required of you.

If you don't want to prescribe or dispense birth control, you don't go into a profession where you would be placed in such a position.

If you don't want to order or administer blood products, you don't go into a profession where such is the standard of practice.

If you don't want to wear pants to work, you don't accept jobs were pants are a requirement.

You don't whine "discrimination" without knowing what the word means.

I can't believe this is an issue for some people.

If you don't want to be sexually harrassed then don't take a job where that might occur. If you don't want to be discriminated against then don't accept a job where that might happen. If you don't want to be sexually assaulted then don't where skimpy clothing. I can't believe these are issues for some people either.

If you don't want to be sexually harrassed then don't take a job where that might occur. If you don't want to be discriminated against then don't accept a job where that might happen. If you don't want to be sexually assaulted then don't where skimpy clothing. I can't believe these are issues for some people either.