Re: Regulation Proposed to Help Protect Health Care Providers from Discrimination Originally Posted by Bortaz
And lose years or decades of compassionate care from every person that chooses not to pursue nursing due to a moral incompatibility with a small part of the profession. I don't believe that's worth it.
I meant to say earlier, by the way, that I agree with you that a pro-life nurse shouldn't be working in an abortion clinic. However, I think this law is meant for workers who encounter an objectionable case in their everyday duties, no matter where they are, and not just some busybody Christian who demanded to work at Abortions R Us and then wouldn't do the work due to being pro-life.
The regulation is being pushed hard by the Bush administration- the likely target is pharmacists who have refused to dispense prescribed birth control, including the morning-after pill, but also normal BC pills.
They want to give these people not only the right to refuse to dispense, but also the right not to refer the patient to any other pharmacies that would dispense.
Same goes with doctors and birth control prescriptions. Even though birth control pills are often used as treatment for gynecological disease, doctors against birth control can refuse to treat these patients and refuse to refer them to somebody who is willing to treat under this regulation.
Imagine a hardcore creationist doctor refusing to prescribe anything but penicillin for a staphylococcal infection because it's his belief that staph haven't adapted to the last 75 years of antibiotic therapy.
Where's the line between personal belief and malpractice?
Nursing News