American Cancer Society supports FDA regulation of tobacco

The tobacco industry spent $13.11 billion in 2005 on advertising and promotions.
In the U.S., tobacco kills more Americans than auto accidents, homicide, AIDS, drugs and fires combined.
Since 1987, Big Tobacco has increased their spending on advertising and promotions every year, reaching $250.8 million in 2005.
Big Tobacco labels their cigarettes with things like light, ultra-light and low-tar even though they can be as deadly and addictive as regular cigarettes.
Source: http://www.thetruth.com/facts/
Public Health campaigns do not affect the ability of big tobacco to market their product, nor do taxes.

I see nothing hypocritical in the American Cancer Society seeking greater regulation of tobacco, as opposed to an outright ban. Such a measure would never pass through congress successfully, so why would they invest precious time and resources in attempting to do so? And if indeed the ACS did receive revenue from tobacco tax dollars (which I'm not claiming that they do), I think it is an excellent application of those funds. In many states, tobacco tax revenue funds road construction- hardly beneficial to the promotion of health and treatment of disease.