Re: Did I do the right thing? Originally Posted by Keysnurse2008
I am pretty niave when it comes to this stuff.....I admit it. jack said he thought that I should perhaps see a counselor to see why it bothers me. I dont think I really have to do that. A counselor might tell me I have trust issues bc when I was a child my dad said he was going to take me fishin and then he didnt. But.....that isnt it. In the ER....and the pods( critical care) ....we all are very close.....like a family. We trust each other . And ....we all .....I have 10 coworkers reading this everyday with me and some tidbits ...are from me and some are from my coworkers. But....we all feel guilty. We are like a second family....and we didnt notice that things had gotten this bad.....we all didnt notice a problem. So...we all feel a huge amount of guilt...bc he is calling all of us several times a day....and we understand how out of control and upside down his life is. But...for me.....I am distancing myself somewhat till he is further along in the program....and calmer. I have a busy busy life, just found out my mom has cancer ( monday)...my son got in a wreck over the weekend and is in Pt rehab...my bettter half wants the living room painted and the garage...my daughter is moving back home ....and my coworkers.....are not working. they are busy breathing down my neck reading this thread over my shoulder. GO BACK TO WORK NOW!!!!!!!!
Now......this thread....has helped alot of us here. I have 10 coworkers standing here reading this with me everyday. Some comments are from them...some from me. But we all feel the same. He is part of our dysfunctional second family here. .....and we all feel guilty to varying degrees...that we didnt notice...that there was a problem...tilll....it almost cost him his license. that.....is where all this is coming from....in all of our comments. We are all very tight nit.....we know everything about all of each others lives....and we trust each other. he lied to us......but we let him down. we didnt recognize there was a major issue...till it slapped us in the face. And the bathroom deal......I have 10 people reading this thread......and nine out of 1o of us said if we saw a coworker making multiple trips to the bathroom we'd think UTI, renal calculi...etc...not drugs. Only one said they'd think drugs....and jack....I am sending her for a drug screen now. LOL. But....we all.....feel like we let him down. He will still have all 10 of us there for him....some more so than others depending on whats going on in our own lives...and we all plan on going to one of the alanon meetings at the end of teh month. Our unit secretary is looking for one of the ones listed as "open " for us. But.....speaking for me....and my unit of cohorts that have posted here under my name.....thank you for sharing your insights, your knowledge and your links...and your own personal stories. It helped. What is behind our posts....jack.....is good old fashioned guilt. We are a dysfunctional functional family here at work. Quirky personalities,...19 degrees between all 10 of us.....and we didnt even notice there was a problem till it slapped us in the face and he almost lost his license.
Keys (and friends! Welcome all!),
First, knowing the questions came from more than one person sheds a little more light on the variety of questions.
Second, degrees mean very little when it comes to this disease (and many others). When I was in treatment, the best counselor there was an older black man with a certificate in chemical dependency counseling (back in the day as they say). He was a recovering heroin/cocaine "street" addict (His description, not mine). The reason I push attending the open meetings of AA, NA, and Al Anon is to get you out of the textbooks (typically written by academicians, not those who have lived it) and in with those who have experienced this disease, both as the addict and as the person(s) who live or work with the addict. Believe me when I say there is much more going on (for everyone) than "simple" guilt. Guilt is a complex emotion that is rarely based on one incident or issue.
Guilt and shame are 2 separate emotions. A quick look at the difference between the 2 helps us see which we are feeling.
Guilt is a healthy emotion that let's us know when we have done something "wrong", prompting us to seek forgiveness and to repair the relationship through discussion and clarification. This leads to stronger relationships with those we care about.
Here's an important point that may help decrease the amount of guilt all of you are experiencing. If you lack the knowledge that would have helped you (and your colleagues) to recognize the signs of the disease in another health care provider (such as frequent bathroom breaks, or volunteering for increasing amounts of overtime, offering to provide frequent breaks, offering to pass meds, declining handwriting and poor charting, see a more
complete list here), then guilt isn't necessary (but it's a natural response). Being guilty about something you don't know is part of shame (which I'll discuss in a moment).
Now, if you want relieve the guilt in a healthy fashion...learn as much as you possibly can about this disease and it's increasing prevalence in the profession. Not just from books, but from actually talking to recovering addicts and their families. Learn how to advocate for change in the profession so we recognize it sooner, intervene early and effectively, and change treatment to evidence based protocols. There is no better way to say "I'm sorry" to your friend than to be prepared to prevent it from happening again in him, yourself, or other nurses. Just as we can't prevent type II diabetes in everyone, we can't prevent addiction in everyone either. But that doesn't mean we don't keep trying, we don't keep searching for a better understanding of the disease and find better protocols (based on science, not beliefs and myths) to prevent and treat the disease when it does happen.
Shame, on the other hand, is an unhealthy emotion in which we believe WE are the problem. we screwed up because we are defective and don't deserve forgiveness. WE should have known better (How?), we should have recognized it sooner (How?). We should have done something? (What?) Without specific knowledge and training, how would any of those things happen? But shame will drive that guilt...no matter how many degrees we possess...if we BELIEVE we are somehow defective. Nurses are excellent at being guilty (I know, I was in the profession a long time...started in ER and ended in anesthesia). In fact, it's been said more than once, "Nurses are professional codependents." Again, you can't say that about everyone. But you posted the word "GUILT" 4 times in this post alone. Codependents are extremely good at feeling guilty for all sorts of things they couldn't have known or did or didn't do. The only folks I know with an equally overdeveloped sense of guilt are Catholics (and I'm a "recovering Catholic" myself! LOL! That's not a "dis" on Catholics...so please don't take it that way, or I'll have to kick some butt. Political correctness was INVENTED by codependents! Like addicts, codependents have an overly sensitive emotional system when it comes to the addict). You have nothing to feel guilty about regarding your friend and colleague. But from here on out, if you do nothing to change this lack of knowledge in yourself and your "dysfunctional" family at work, then you have plenty to feel guilty about.
As I said, it's extremely difficult to recognize signs and symptoms of a disease that you receive little (if any) training about. The persistent myths (by health care providers and the general public) regarding this disease are proof of the lack of education.
Stigma results from the lack of education regarding this disease (and many others). Addiction is one of those diseases where not being a person with the disease makes empathy extremely difficult. While I can successfully treat someone with heart disease, cancer, or diabetes without having suffered with the disease (i.e., as a purely scientific geek), it's very, very difficult to pick up on the nuances of thoughts and behaviors resulting from addictive disease if you haven't experienced it first hand. Combine lack of education about the actual disease of addiction (as opposed to the many consequences of the disease like cirrhosis, esophageal varices, domestic and other violence, trauma, etc.) with lack of experience, and it's no wonder there are all sorts of misconceptions. The problems is, these misconceptions cost people their lives.
Your description of the unit as a dysfunctional family is right on. And as a result of varying degrees of dysfunction, different people will react differently. You stated, "he lied to us". Yes, he did. It's part of the disease. But because you haven't learned about the disease process, including the areas of the brain affected, you're going to continue have a hard time "wrapping your head around all of this." Areas of the brain include memory, learning, motivation, and the areas associated with impulse control. This means they don't learn from their negative consequences (they CAN'T learn during active disease), they don't remember incidents and conversations when under the influence, they don't want to do the things they used to enjoy, and they can't control obsessive thoughts about their drug(s), or stop the complsive use of the drug once they get going.
You said you let him down because you didn't recognize the signs and symptoms. Go to the list of signs at this link and see how many you don't know. How can you diagnose appendicitis if you don't know the signs and symptoms? As ER nurses, we have (I had) the responsibility of understanding and recognizing those diseases and disorders I am going to see in those entering my department. Some stats on alcohol and ER admissions:
- Every day, over 20,000 people enter emergency departments in the United States for alcohol related injuries and illness - an estimated 7.6 million annually.
- 7% of injured adult patients are intoxicated when they present to the emergency department, another 20% will screen positive for alcohol use or abuse. These individuals represent the 18 million adults each year who have alcohol disorders. (Source: Emergency Nurses Association. Emergency Nurses Position Statement (2004). Approved by the ENA Board of Directors July 2004. Statistical citations available at: www.ena.org/about/position/AlcoholScreening.asp. Retrieved 1/10/2005).
- ER patients with unmet treatment needs (alcohol or other drugs) are 81% more likely to be admitted during their emergency visit, and 46% more likely to have reported making at least one emergency department visit in the previous 12 months.
- Tennessee patients with unmet treatment needs who received emergency medical services accounted for $777.2 million in extra hospital charges for the state in 2000, which translates to an additional $1,568 for each emergency patient with an addiction problem that wasn’t addressed. (Extrapolate those numbers to todays costs for ALL ER's in the country!).
Nurses are in great company. Primary care physicians miss or misdiagnose alcohol-abusing patients by these amazing numbers:
- 94% of primary care physicians fail to diagnose substance abuse when presented with early symptoms of alcohol abuse in an adult patient.
- 41% of pediatricians fail to diagnose illegal drug abuse when presented with a classic description of a drug-abusing teenage patient.
- Only a small percentage of physicians consider themselves “very prepared” to diagnose alcoholism (19.9%), illegal drug use (16.9%), and prescription drug abuse (30.2%). In sharp contrast, 82.8% feel “very prepared” to identify hypertension; 82.3%, diabetes; 44.1%, depression.
- Most patients (53.7%) say their primary care physician did nothing about their addiction: 43% say the physician never diagnosed it, and 10.7% say the physician knew about it, but did nothing about it. Less than a third of primary care physicians (32.1%) carefully screen for substance abuse.
- Nearly 75% of patients say their primary care physician was not involved in their decision to seek treatment.
- 29.5% of patients said their physicians knew about their addiction and prescribed psychoactive drugs such as sedatives or Valium, which could cause additional problems.
- 54.8% of patients feel physicians do not know how to detect addictions.
- 35.3% of patients thought their physician was too busy to detect their addiction.
- The typical patient had a substance abuse problem for 10 years before receiving treatment.
- 57.7% of physicians say they don't discuss substance abuse with their patients because they believe their patients lie about it, and nearly 85% of patients agree. (lying is part of the disease!!! Do they not discuss other potentially fatal diseases with patients for the same reason?)
- 35.1% of physicians cite time constraints, and 10.6% are concerned they won’t be reimbursed for the time necessary to screen and treat a substance-abusing patient.
Are alcohol and drug screening, brief interventions, and treatment referrals for patients performed in your ER? If not, why not. (That's not an accusatory tone or meant to be threatening in any way. It's a legitimate and appropriate question). A major reason may be (depending on state insurance laws where you are) a clause in insurance laws that state if any treatment is provided to someone whose reason for being admitted is due to alcohol or drugs, the insurance provider may deny payment. So, if I'm a doc in the ER, or a hospital administrator, and I know if I document anywhere in the chart this patient may be here as a result of substance abuse the bills won't get paid, why in the world would I chart something that tells the insurance provider?!? So, the bills get covered, and then the patient is discharged with a chronic, progressive, potentially fatal (for them and those around them) disease. Is that ethical? No! Is it professional? No! Does it happen? EVERYDAY! If this was an accepted disease, this wouldn't happen. "But they did this to themselves!" Yeah, so do lung cancer patients who smoke. So do adult onset diabetics who overeat, don't exercise, etc. We don't withhold payment when their disease needs treatment.
As an advocate for impaired nurses, part of what I do when a client hires me is provide educational programs for the unit where they work(ed). I provide sessions so colleagues can vent safely and learn about the disease and how they have been affected by the whole situation. The folks who say they haven't been affected are either in denial or lying. Anyone who works with or has a relationship with an active addict are affected, it a matter of degree. I've had to participate in and lead one intervention on 5 colleagues in the past 19 years. Believe me, I was affected! I was angry and hurt, just like you guys. But I had places to go and vent and deal with the emotions.
You all have been presented with an awesome opportunity to change the way things get done in your unit, your institution, and in your own practice. If you don't get everything out of this that you can, THEN you can feel guilty!!!!
Actively recovering addicts have a highly developed 6th sense when it comes to others in recovery. They are capable of seeing through the fog of confusion associated with the disease as well as the smoke screen produced by the active addict. It's not to say they never get fooled, but it is definitely more difficult. They also
bring a significantly higher level of empathy to the mix since they've been there.
I think a major reason is addiction isn't accepted as a legitimate disease is the lack of knowledge about the disease by health care professionals. Until that changes, our current paradigm regarding addiction will continue to be fed by myth, misbelief, and misinformation. Our professional and cultural paradigm won't change and valuable friends, family members, and colleagues will continue to die needlessly.
I continue to look at the history of HIV/AIDS as a method for affecting change in a culture's paradigm of stigma associated with an illness. Originally, it was considered a "Haitian" disease, quickly becoming a "gay disease". Until Ryan White and other non-gay, "asexual" individuals, who were not addicts (meaning children and other people who were extremely unlikely to have been infected by their own activities) became infected, it was easy to
ignore those who contracted the disease, which were mostly gay men, prostitutes, and IV drug addicts (the 21st century's version of "Lions and Tigers and Bears...OH MY!). All of these folks were considered immoral and therefore OK to scorn and ignore. But once the "innocents" began to develop the disease (after being infected by some immoral beast such as a philandering or drug addicted spouse, or the evil and infected health care provider), our society has a moral imperative to "save the innocents"!
If there is some way to engender that same sense of "save the innocents" for this disease, I have no doubt there will be a significant paradigm shift in the medical community and society.
Jack
Nursing News