Re: anyone ever get their license back after revocation?
Actually, I must disagree with the above response, that is "it only makes sense to be on the exclsuoin list as payments are directly related to your license". This is not true as the scope and span of this exclusion list reaches much farther than that.
First and foremost, as a recovering addict who lost her license due to addiction, I was not told about this list. The ADA makes it illegal for any employer to ban a recovering addict from employment, yet when the balanced budget act was passed in 1997, they included all heath care professionals who had lost their license regardless of the reason, effectively barring them from an entire industry.
To find yourself on a list that was initially creayed for individuals who intentionally and feloniously defrauded the government because of an illness IS DRACONIAN. I can not work in a physician's office (in any capacity) would not be able to work in a hospital as a JANITOR, nor for any pharmaceuitcal or insurance company. Point being, you are barred from working ina an entire industry even in positions where it is not necessary to have a license.
Furthermore, I may not want my license back, but I find it completely irrational that the governement can be this punitive to sick individuals as a way to impose fines and collect money. I have NEVER been in trouble legally, yet now anytime a background check for employment is run on me, this pops up as a big, electronic "scarlet a" and they assume that I must have done something really bad and am subsequently denied employment.
To any of you who think this is fair or reasonable, you may want to re-think your position. NO OTHER industry has this kind of repurcussions for a lost license. This is literally ruining lives and making people lose hope.
I beg ANY of you who have been affected by this, contact your senators, congressman, and whoever else will listen. It is prejudicial and ruining lives
Nursing News