OK OK
no one replied to my last thread, no harm done.
I was considering the pursuit of a PA or an NP and have been reviewing the ups and downs.
I have done a little research on incomes for NP's vs. PA's and have discovered one study in 2001 claims "on average" PA's tend to make around 71K a year and NP's average 63K a year. Granted these are averages. What gets me is that any dolt with a BA degree can go and get a PA in almost half the time it takes to get an NP and have half the experience but still actualize a greater salary. Why is this?
The PA degree was initially supposed to allow field medics with a lot of experience in, well battle, to get certification allowing them to take more weight off the physicians hands without having to go to school for 10 years (an exaggeration) to become a physician. Now adays, this is generally not the case. I'm not trashing PA's altogether, however, I know the one at my PCP's office has a BA in French Lit. and I as a nurse can see the type of care being delivered. The NP at my PCP's office pretty much sealed the assumption with an interview.
I have heard other such tales.
How can such quality of care or healthcare experience receive a greater reward.
any thoughts appreciated............................................................