patient acuity system
- 0Feb 10, '07 by nursbjb00Does anyone use a patient acuity system? My nurses feel like the acuity of their patients have increased so much that the normal ratio they are used to now feels unsafe to them... with battleing with the patient flow from the er when we have open beds, its hard to tell the nurses they have to yet take another patient to stop from posting the pt in boarding status in the er. help!!!!
- 0Mar 8, '07 by DianeK4HVCHEHOLISTIC-
You really did not specify how large the unit was.....25....50 beds? How did you figure staf ratio/acuity as "normal"? I am currently working with the Keane System in attempting to set up a patientacuity/staff ratio program that would fit our needs in a small rural hospital in southeastern ohio.
I can see this is a hot topic!! LOL No one really answered your questions, and I'm not sure I can either, but I'll try.
- 0Mar 8, '07 by BluehairOur unit could use something more concrete too! Same problem, acuity is increasing but there is nothing concrete to hang your staffing criteria on. Having a more concrete 'mathmatical' process would help all concerned (admin. & HR for hiring practices, current unit staff, staffing co-ordinator and charge nurses for day to day operations, etc.) to see our actual need.
- 0Mar 14, '07 by llllivwe used an acuity system. you check a box next to the service that will be needed for the next shift. the nurses that work the floor were not included in setting it up and deciding options.
half of the stuff we had to do was not included in the choices(like transporting pt off the unit for xray where you could be gone for 30 min to an hour/sometimes two staff needed to reposition patient). or when a staff member has to leave the floor with a patient for a procedure and be gone for hours or all day.
i worked off site from the hospital so we had no support staff. there was nothing to indicate starting heplocks(it was done by the iv team at main hospital),changing picc/central line dressings(also iv team), and so many more things. plus how can you anticipate what will happen on the next shift???!!!
i checked every box possible every day. we would get "talked to" for checking too many boxes. like i checked lab draws every day because they drew labs on the next shift. they would complain if the pt didn't get that done--but i'm anticipating the doc to come in and he might order it. most pts got labs almost daily.
i checked shower--we were only supposed to do it on shower day(qod)--but who is to say if that pt has an incontinent episode or his family comes in and demands a shower at that time.
i just tried to anticipate any and all things that might happen to help with our staffing because it was bad. and we were offsite--we had to call 911 for a code!!
i floated to the main hospital and did their grasp--i was shocked to find out they got more points for their dressing changes than we did. burn care did the dressing changes over there. we did our own(including wound vac and complicated burns etc...). they also had alot more options to choose from than we did. i notified our manager and the person in charge of grasp at our hospital but nothing changed.
i don't know why i bothered--it was still like moonrose said--#of patients=# of nurses and or cnas.
i think our staffing dropped the last time from 6.3(without counting unit sec and manager) to 5.7 counting unit sec, manager, and assistant manager.
it is just ridiculous. i better stop now but you get the idea. please don't do this to your staff!!Last edit by lllliv on Mar 14, '07
- 3Mar 15, '07 by oldiebutgoodieQuote from EHOLISTICHello,Does anyone use a patient acuity system? My nurses feel like the acuity of their patients have increased so much that the normal ratio they are used to now feels unsafe to them... with battleing with the patient flow from the er when we have open beds, its hard to tell the nurses they have to yet take another patient to stop from posting the pt in boarding status in the er. help!!!!
Not a manager, but have done research in the past on this. There is a software product by Quadramed called "AcuityPlus", which was used on an MICU I worked for.
There are some tools which can be used to judge acuity and amount of time nurses need to spend with a patient.
The TISS-28 (Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System), developed in 1996, produces a prediction of the number of minutes of nursing care required on an 8 hour shift for a particular patient. The TISS-28 is based on required interventions, such as suctioning, dressing changes, medications, and parenteral or enteral nutrition (Lefering, Zart, & Neugebauer, 2000).
The NEMS (Nine equivalents of nursing manpower use score) scale, developed in 1997, is based on the TISS-28, but has reduced the number of items in the instrument from 28 to 9 (Miranda, Moreno, & Iapichino, 1997).
Then there is the Apache II system for determining acuity and mortality. This is an online calculator:
Unfortunately, you could probably produce very compelling data for lowering your ratios, but it will probably be ignored, as most hospitals are looking at the bottom line now.
My hospital has raised their ratio to 6:1 (a Magnet hospital who advertised their low patient:nurse ratios), and these 6 patients are total care, heparin and cardizem drips, traches, blood hanging, etc etc etc. It's a shame, because most of us feel unsafe now.
- 2Aug 27, '08 by Luv NursingI've posted before regarding needing something concrete, so I can see we are all in the same boat. I've develped some spreadsheets I use for personal uses, that all me to show a more clear picture as to what the staffing vs. census/acuity is. Of course, it means nothing to non-clinical persons who are controlling the situation (HR, CEO, etc) but it at least shows you are actively keeping an eye on things as well as those non-clinical persons who are giving you the grief don't have a CLUE of all the realities and possibilities.
It may be timing consuming to enter your data, but if you'll send me your e-mail, I'll be happy to send it to you. The spreadsheet is in Excel just as a heads up.
My e-mail is firstname.lastname@example.org
- 0May 29, '10 by Acuity driven Carenapochi, llc. healthcare company has developed an acuity based patient care software.
www.napochi.com for software demo.
<table class=contentpaneopen><tbody><tr><td class=contentheading width="100%">medium® staff management and acuity system </td></tr></tbody></table><table class=contentpaneopen><tbody><tr><td valign=top>[color=#333333]the medium interactive assignment board (iab) is a resource management software for large clinics, hospitals and health systems. iab modules automatically integrate any patient classification methodology into its own workload and needs-based staffing functions per nursing unit. the existing classification process can be incorporated within the medium iab system or a customized patient classification methodology can be developed to meet individual nursing unit needs. individualized patient acuity attributes (or interventions) can be assigned to each patient on a shift or daily basis per unit. medium iab productivity bundle modules include: resource management, staff scheduler, physician scheduler, (safe) driven patient assignment, room/patient/staff allocation, interactive patient tracking, and care driven acuity.
- incorporates and automates the existing patient classification and acuity assignment process
- “real time” identification of available staff and patient acuity within a single unit or across the enterprise
- fully customizable patient classification methodology to meet the needs of any health care delivery system
- view scheduled patient density on a daily, weekly or monthly basis and with a one click overlay of color coded available future resources to predict staffing overages and shortfalls
- extremely user friendly interface with touch screen and drag and drop capabilities
- staff may be sent alerts and tasks by email, pager or text message
- easy retrieval of the patient care log and the physical patient locations after emergency department triage
- interoperable with any information systems that supports hl7 v2.x, hl7 v3, x12, xml, dicom, edi, ncpdp, delimited text, csv data types
- enhances patient care by more efficiently allocating nursing resources and improving communication among care providers
- meets or exceeds hospital, state government and jcaho requirements for monitoring and reporting compliance with patient care standards
- increases staff productivity by automating existing manual staffing and acuity assignment processes
- facilitates clinical and administrative decision-making, thereby improving patient movement through the care process and reducing length of stay
- ensures patient safety and reduces provider liability by tracking each provider’s patient care involvement
</td></tr></tbody></table><table class=contentpaneopen><tbody><tr><td valign=top>
</td></tr></tbody></table><table dir=ltr border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 width=624><tbody><tr><td>
- 0Jan 29, '11 by shawnlvnI took a look at their site and found an interesting video on their interactive assignment board: http://www.napochi.us/index.php?opti...d=21&Itemid=61
Has anyone else seen this system?
- 0Jan 30, '11 by MomRN0913I think the problem is acuity is only scored in a critical care setting. When the hospital looks at it, med surg is med surg. Those are medically managed patients who shouldn't be so acute. If they are more acute, they will be on a telemetry floor. If too acute for telemetry, they will go to a PCU or ICU. SO I think most actue care hospitals determine acuity as to what unit they are on. If these patients are more acute than what your unit usually handles, perhaps they need an upgrade in status to a different unit?