1hopefulChik

1hopefulChik

Member
  • Content

    114
  • Visitors

    3,458
  • Followers

    0

About 1hopefulChik

Latest Activity

  1. ANY WOMAN can buy birth control of her choice. There are no prohibitions. NONE!!!!! How dishonest and sneaky that some keep trying to make this about ACCESS when it's about PAYING FOR IT! This is NOT that big a deal. It wasn't before ACA. It isn'...
  2. SCOTUS ruled HL is permitted to opt out of SUBSIDIZING birth control methods that contradict their well-established beliefs. It's AGAINST THE LAW for an employer to tell you have to spend your wages- which is why the SCOTUS ruling is nothing like the...
  3. Lie much?!
  4. You didn't answer the question. HOW are they telling employees how to spend their own money?
  5. So you agree I'm right about progressives finding a bogeyman when they have nothing to advocate without villification!!! Your post was an EXCELLENT example of my point. When you can't handle the message, try and kill the messenger. Funny, yet sad.
  6. What you said is so dishonest and foolish I can't respond to it. It's not based in fact or reality. I'll answer you right after you explain exactly how HL is telling employees how they can spend their money. You won't because you can't!
  7. By nature, progressives are always 'fighting' against something. If they don't have a cause, they make one up. This is the same tired 'war on women'- except no bullets and no teeth!
  8. Sorry for sounding so cynical but what absolute hogwash!!!! ANY WOMAN can buy birth control of her choice. There are no prohibitions. How dishonest and sneaky that some keep trying to make this about ACCESS when it's about PAYING FOR IT! HL nor an...
  9. I see progressives are digging up their bogeyman for the elections. When they don't have something to run on, they rail against something-anything- no matter what it is. This topic is old news. Thankfully, this hysteria is not contagious and the ge...
  10. There was NO DECISION mandating tax payer involvement. I'm not an 'either or' thinker- as extremist thinking tends to be all or nothing. I say focus on everything in between, particularly those options that minimize taxpayer exposure.
  11. Nope. If you work, use your income to supply your own needs. If you need help, there are plenty of public and private organizations that can help. Leave taxpayers out of expenditures that people could afford if they prioritize.
  12. I've actually had that happen! I'm arguing that benefits are not mandatory. Health benefits can be compensation and optional at the same time, just like bonuses. Benefits and bonus. Payable to the employee. Not mandated or required.
  13. Last I checked the Supreme Court can't order anything because they can't legislate. The brief pointed out that as an alternative the government could opt to cover what an employer declines to pay under ACA law. It was introduced as an option, not an...
  14. Even if it were, it's income that could go away as soon as the employer decides- because the employer owns it.
  15. WOW! Everybody's a hypocrite because we all fall short of standards for excellence in our own life. I guess you've NEVER contradicted your own beliefs ever, right? If so, why stop there. Violate ALL your beliefs since you messed up in a few. Many ...