Re: Nightingale Pledge and Nursing hats at pinning ceremony.... Originally Posted by multicollinearity
OK. I understand you aren't defending use of the original pledge.
It is my opinion that there is too much religious baggage having to do with "purity" and controlling women's sexuality to use the word "purity." "Integrity" would be a better choice, IMO.
You know many young women in the U.S. are giving "purity pledges" to their families, and in particular, to their fathers?
I've seen some updated versions of the pledge that I like, that don't get into the "purity" nonsense. If a school really feels the need to use a pledge/oath, I could see using one of those. I agree that the original pledge embodies all the worst Victorian clichés about "womanhood," femininity, servitude, etc. (I can't imagine that Flo herself would have ever written such drivel, or allowed her name to be attached to it!)
I am aware of the "purity pledge" movement -- the whole business gives me the heebie-jeebies (the father-daughter connection), and I think it's interesting that studies have been done that have found that this type of program not only doesn't work (rates of premarital sex are no lower than the general teen popularion), but the participants actually end up with
higher teen pregnancy rates than the "heathen"

girls who don't take part in such programs.
Nursing News