Nurses Helping Nurses
allnurses Network: Central | Jobs | Books | Newsletter
allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses
Home General News Blogs Articles Students Region Specialty Degrees F.A.Q.
Infusion Nursing or Intravenous Nursing /

picc line criteria



Did You Know?
allnurses is the largest community for nurses on the web. We now have over 388,363 members! Join today to network with other nurses, laugh, share, and much more.

Jun 22, 2007 06:53 PM

picc line criteria


Hi,
We started a new picc program at our hospital. I need to know what the criteria is regarding pt.s on Plavix, coumadin, asa, with elevated pt,inr, or ptt. We don t like to do picc's on pt's with >1.7 inr. Are there any guidelines we can go by? Any info is appreciated. Help! Thanks.


Share

Search Tags
None
Top

 
Advertisement
Sponsored Links
 
Reply
4 Comments
No. 1
from PICC ACE
Old Jun 28, 2007, 11:54 PM

Default Re: picc line criteria
Guidelines,no. Clinical judgement,thorough assessment and evaluation of risk vs benefit,yes.
I've done PICC's for patients with platelets of 10,INR of over 7,shortly after 600mg of Plavix,on TPA,etc. Where did you get the INR of 1.7 from? Radiology? They have their "guidelines" because they are going into noncompressible areas,a much different situation than PICC placement. If they hit an artery inside the chest or abdomen on an anticoagulated patient,that's a potential emergency. If your PICC site oozes a little more than usual,open a few more fluffs and hold pressure longer.
A skilled nurse using ultrasound and MST for PICC placement is a lot safer than the alternatives (i.e. the average floor nurses and phlebotomists and their multiple sticks on the patient or an MD using 'landmarks' for a central line).
Think of the relative risk/benefit issues. Imagine a patient with a mechanical valve,needs a PICC,INR 3.2. No CV surgeon is going to agree to risk letting the INR go under 1.7 just for the 45 minutes it'll take for a PICC to be placed.
Good luck with your new program.
Top
 
No. 2
Old Jun 29, 2007, 12:57 AM

Default Re: picc line criteria
Originally Posted by PICC ACE View Post
Guidelines,no. Clinical judgement,thorough assessment and evaluation of risk vs benefit,yes.
I've done PICC's for patients with platelets of 10,INR of over 7,shortly after 600mg of Plavix,on TPA,etc. Where did you get the INR of 1.7 from? Radiology? They have their "guidelines" because they are going into noncompressible areas,a much different situation than PICC placement. If they hit an artery inside the chest or abdomen on an anticoagulated patient,that's a potential emergency. If your PICC site oozes a little more than usual,open a few more fluffs and hold pressure longer.
A skilled nurse using ultrasound and MST for PICC placement is a lot safer than the alternatives (i.e. the average floor nurses and phlebotomists and their multiple sticks on the patient or an MD using 'landmarks' for a central line).
Think of the relative risk/benefit issues. Imagine a patient with a mechanical valve,needs a PICC,INR 3.2. No CV surgeon is going to agree to risk letting the INR go under 1.7 just for the 45 minutes it'll take for a PICC to be placed.
Good luck with your new program.


Agree 100%

Clinical judgement/critical thinking is the key.

One of my "sister" hospitals wants to decline anyone with abnormal coags/platelets.

Absurd.

A PICC will (almost) always be the safest type of central line to place.

I, too, have placed PICCs in pts with DIC, on heparin drips, on integrilin drips, etc, without any known complication.

However, I did once decline a patient that had an INR >10, hct <20.0, that was a Jehovah's Wittness (declined blood products). He was on coumadin for an AVR. A collegue placed his PICC (on my day off) when his INR got to therapeutic (still elevated, but within range for his valve replacement).

It isn't always black/white.

When in doubt, I consult with two specialties: IR, to get their opinion, and the ordering MD, so that I can chart that he/she agrees that the benefits outweigh the risks. I make sure, too, that the consenting party (patient or family) is aware of the additional risks, and that the physician believes that the benefits outweigh the risks.

Seriously. If the INR was 10, would you rather have a nurse placing a US-guided picc, or a resident doing an IJ (blind stick????)
Top
 
No. 3
from bobnurse
Old Jul 11, 2007, 02:44 PM

Default Re: picc line criteria
PICC's are indicated for the patient with a bleeding risk. Much safer than a physician trying to place a cvc.
Top
 
No. 4
from Jamie-RN
Old Apr 22, 2009, 05:07 PM

Default Re: picc line criteria
I'm working on my BSN and doing a project on PICC lines. Do any of you know if there are any facilities that have made PICC line placement standard for all of their ICU patients upon admission? Or is this even a reasonable idea, if not why?
Top
 
Reply




Thread Tools


Who's Online
480 members
4,152 guests
4,632

2

Interesting article on ThedaCare's Collaborative Care Model

4

Possible breakthrough regarding MS

57

16th Philly area hospital to stop delivering babies: Mercy...

7

Really interesting article on Indian open hearts

5

High-Tech Pump Does What Her Heart Can't

3

Air Force RN Found Not Guilty

7

California Imposes Stricter Rules Regarding Drug Abuse In...

40

Are older nurses being forced out of the profession?

3

An outlook in California?

8

Australian surgeons successfully separate conjoined twins



1

Society Needs Care Too

12

Why am I doing this, anyway?

2

Nurse Heal Thyself

9

My Papa, why I am the nurse I am today.

17

I made it through

11

An angel's gaze

15

A Sister Never Forgets

16

Ruby's Marbles

37

What Do Operating Room Nurses Do?

14

My Little Old Jedi

20

I love this job......

23

"I hear voices"

19

Preventing FRUTI (Foley Related Urinary Tract Infection) in...

24

Error and Attitude

10

It's Just a Shower





Currently Reading This Page: 1 (0 members & 1 guests)

Interested in the hottest topics of the week? Subscribe to the Nurse-zine Newsletter.
Enter email address: