I've had 1 very similar situation: the patient/resident had been on a pureed diet for years...due to several strokes and cerebral palsy. He required nectar-thick liquids, had bedside suction...the whole 9 yards.
This particular resident complained a lot about the pureed texture & being self-conscious about not eating 'regular food'. Well, after a month or so of complaining to the doctor, he was placed on a REGULAR DIET! There was no 'advance as tolerated'. He went from pureed to regular in
one days time.
The nurses nearly FELL OVER. The doctor's rationale was 'quality of life' and dignity issues for the resident. This resident didn't have any living blood relatives, -- his medical POA that was a long-time friend of the family. They supported the doctor, saying, "If he wants solid food, just give it to him!"
Of course, the dining room was supervised, so he always had watchful eyes nearby during meals.--- However...once his diet was changed, within a week, he was busy sneaking snacks every chance he could. He got some potato chips from another resident & was eating them in his room...He aspirated and was hospitalized with pneumonia---and was dead within a week of being admitted.----The doctor made the comment "at least he died happy"
Helloooo! He aspirated on a POTATO CHIP & died ALONE in the hospital! Not even around familiar caregivers and faces.
The comment from the family is horrible..no two ways about it.
If I were you, I'd document "how well meals are being tolerated"...Document the presence of supervision. Document patient teaching (chin tuck while swallowing, small bites encouraged, etc.)-- If care plans are done on this patient/resident, I'd mention it in the monthly summary, too...and indicate that ongoing monitoring is being done to assess/assure patient tolerance/safety.Your heart is definitely in the right place. :angel2:
Nursing News