The database ate my homework! Someone asked yesterday, before the database glitch, which drug cards people would recommend so I shared some info that a friend and I had collected on the various card sets then shared with our classmates. Luckily, I still have that e-mail I can recopy and repaste here. Once I paste it, I'll add a few updates, so you might find that the verb tenses are inconsistent, but it shouldn't affect the usefulness (or lack thereof) of the information/opinions.
We reviewed several brands of pharmacology cards [Mosby, MediQuik, Pharm Phlash, (Davis) Nurses' Med Deck, Kaplan NCLEX 300]. I suppose that for each person, it depends on why you want the cards for which is "best" but here's what I've noticed (in case you have any interest in getting cards).
GENERAL CARD SET OBSERVATIONS:
- No set will have every drug. In fact, most sets seem to have at least one or two Amazon reviewers who say that the set is missing at least some COMMON drugs (not new or strange ones). My thought on that is that at least I don't have to write out EVERY card!
- When it comes to negative reviews, quite a few of them are from people who were looking for an "easy" way to learn drugs and were upset that the card was basically still all the same overwhelming info that was in their text or drug guide, so I don't think their negative reviews count. Also, some low reviews were due to the sets not having all the "common" drugs a person thought they should have, but since I'm only hoping they will have MOST drugs to save me from making cards for every drug, I'm OK with a few "common" drugs being missing. Because of this, I did not choose based on just the rating the set has on Amazon or elsewhere.
- Nearly every set is on flimsy stock, often only as good as a moderately heavy bond paper or perhaps the best are on a lightweight cardstock. (I think I did see one set that said it was very thin but laminated, so I guess that set might hold up better.)
- Most (but not all sets) are on rather large 'cards' (4" x 6" or as big as 5" x 7") often making them inconvenient for putting in a scrubs pocket and if you're like me, you don't want to fold the cards 'cause that makes them "ugly," LOL. If you're getting one of the slimline storage clipboards that others recommended in this thread, you could put the cards in there (though apparently some programs do not allow clipboards). (If your program allows digital assistants, drug cards may be unnecessary as you'll be able to just have your smartphone, ipod touch or pda in your pocket for easy reference.)
- It's a little tricky to compare the sets by "greatest number of drugs" because they each have their own way of classifying/sorting so one set that says 1,000 drugs may have the same number of useful cards as a set that says '400 generics.' It's not challenging to compare, but you can't just go by seeing 1,000 on the front of one set and 400 on the front of the other set.
- Random format issue for (I think) all sets -- the cardboard boxes seem to fall apart on all of them so if I get a set, I'll put them in a plastic index file box. Also, none seem to have any sort of index tabs to help you find cards faster, so adding a few index tabs (like A-D, E-H, and so on) would probably make it a little faster. NOTE: putting them in a larger box may mean needing to add a styrofoam (or other) spacer to help protect the cards from getting mangle by jostling around in the box during transport.
- Not all programs allow pre-printed drug cards during clinicals (bizarre!)
SPECIFIC CARD SET OBSERVATIONS
A lot of my notes focus on MediQuik and Mosby as those were my top 2 choices. The Med Deck looked like it had the same kind of content as the other two, but there was something about the way they looked that I didn't like as much. It probably had to do with my graphic design background and so was a rather random, personal choice. I still think Med Deck is worth a look. - Some sets are like a card version of a drug book page (which is what I wanted) -- both Medi Quik and Mosby seem to be this type of set (and I think Med Deck also is, but I can't remember that set very clearly and can't find online pictures). Both sets are arranged alphabetically by generic name (at least that's my understanding -- so far, every drug I've needed was under the generic name. NOTE: The index lists all the drugs by both their generic AND trade name, so you can look them up by either.). (Mosby has sample cards viewable on Amazon, but I don't think MediQuik does)
- Both Mosby and Medi Quik have CLASS cards too (don't know about Med Deck as it was quickly knocked out of the running for me and I didn't take thorough notes on that set). The class cards seem to have rather different content (between the two sets) but I can't say that I really liked one over the other. If I recall correctly, the MediQuick set has more class cards than the Mosby set.
The class cards intrigued me. My summer of reviewing drugs was a lot easier when I decided to focus on drug classes rather than trying to learn all of the details about specific drugs. - The Kaplan set was (I think) just their top 300 drugs. If that's true, it's far fewer cards than the other sets. I didn't give them much time as there was a LOT of "white space" on these cards, which might be nice for review, but didn't seem to be very complete for using as a drug guide alternate/supplement. (They were not at all like having a page from a drug guide which is what I wanted.) They might be very nice for highlighting "most relevant" info for the NCLEX. (sample cards viewable on Amazon)
- Pharm Flash cards appear to have last been updated in 2008. eek. The format is definitely not the "torn from my drug guide." The color coding is nice, but apparently they are arranged by body system rather than alphabetically by generic name. Again, eek. I didn't even consider them. (They are published by FA Davis, but do not appear to be "the" Davis cards, which may be why they have not been updated since 2008.)
- (Davis) Nurse's Med Deck cards -- I looked at these at B&N, but since something about their formatting was graphically displeasing to me, I didn't take detailed notes on them. The one comment that I've seen online that would concern me is that it appears that some cards are filed by generic and some by brand. (Honestly can't imagine why any set of cards would organize by anything but generic name.) They appear to be the "page torn from drug guide type" (based on Amazon review complaints), but I don't know for sure. Depsite the fact that I didn't like the look of them, I think that both of my prefered sets (Mosby and MediQuik) had reviews where the person said they didn't like whichever of my favorites and ended up getting the Med Deck and ended up liking that set a lot better, so I think they're definitely worth a look.
I am normally a kinesthetic learner, so I tried making my own cards at first. However, I usually needed to make 20 (or more) cards at once and since I was making "page from the drug guide" cards, that was a LOT of info that I was trying to neatly speed write onto the cards. By the time I was done making a set, I hadn't learned anything because my brain was completely overloaded. For me, it seemed worthwhile to buy pre-made cards and spend all of the time I had been spending writing out cards actually LEARNING some of the info instead. That said, I know that I have seen multiple comments on AllNurses from others who swear by learning more from making their own cards, so I encourage everyone to do whatever works best for them.
If you're seriously considering buying cards, I think it's worth a drive to a bookstore to see them in person. (I had an hour drive so I called ahead to make sure they had them all.) When you're there, if you want to look at a few cards side by side, I take the boxes up to the information desk, have a look then leave the boxes with the staff so they can re-shrinkwrap them, but to each his own on that aspect of the buying experience