Re: Thimrosal-Autism-Childhood Vaccinations Originally Posted by CrunchyMama
My my my....oh well, I'm done arguing about this. I've been researching vaccines since my son was about 18 months old, so that's geee....almost 4 years.....so don't tell me to educate myself! I'm not going to waste my time. Sorry, but I don't look at one link and say that's the fact. If you don't want to trust the CDC on what's in the vaccines, then I don't know what to tell ya. :/ LATER!
Fair enough.
I am telling you to educate yourself because you have a fundamental misunderstanding of several major components of biological science. It's not meant to insult you-- I want to explain to you and any other lurkers why your viewpoint is not shared by that of science's, and it's hard to do that when we aren't speaking the same language, if you will.
Your link from the CDC lists and corroborates with my list from the FDA and other sites. However, you are interpreting what the CDC link says incorrectly. The FDA link is clearer, to that extent. It lists when each vaccine was made thimerosal-free.
You can even see which brands contain which, and then ask for specific brands at the pediatrician. There is no good excuse not to vaccinate due to fear of thimerosal ingestion, when you have the ability and the knowledge to avoid such products.
However, that's only one side of the coin.
The second issue is that we are at an impasse regarding the understanding of dosaging. Once again, I can only reiterate by explaining that you receive many orders of magnitude higher exposure to organic mercury in seafood than you do in the sparse few thimerosal-containing vaccines available. An adequate analogy is acetaminophen. Everyone knows it can be harmful to your liver, however, while 500-1000mg doses are perfectly safe for most adults, if you were to multiply that by 100 and ingest 50-100
grams instead, you would be facing a painful and likely inevitable death.
Of course, on the contrary, if you were to divide that dose by 100, and take 5-10 mg, you would experience none of the therapeutic effects and your body wouldn't be affected one way or the other, even if your liver function was poor to begin with.
When you divide
that dose by 100, you start to get an adequate picture of what we're talking about.
Nursing News