Re: Nursing Shortage Fallacy?
While the term 'shortage' is misleading, it sure feels like one when there are not enough nurses employed in a facility to adequately staff the shifts. It doesn't really matter too much how many UNemployed (by their own choosing) nurses there are; if they are unwilling to work at the bedside where they are most needed, then a shortage it is. If there's a hundred unemployed, licensed RNs in my county but none of them are willing to pick up a shift at the hospital, it doesn't matter to me that they COULD work, but don't. I'M working short-staffed, so....that's the bottom line.
IMO, as the economy worsens, the need for healthcare does not, only the ability of the people to pay for it, and the hospitals to accomodate the freebies. Reimbursements will go into the toilet, meaning that there will be less $$ to pay the staff, meaning that if now your facility pays for a ratio of 1:6, expect 1:8-9 later. Yes, we all scream about staffing ratios, safe assignments, me included. But just who is going to pay for those lower ratios if the general public has fewer jobs and fewer means for insurance?
I don't doubt that I'll continue to have a job through whatever depression is coming our way (forget recession, we're ALOT closer to the Great Depression than I want to think about). But I also don't doubt that hospitals aren't going to be bending over backwards to make my workload lighter when they are cutting OUT staff, and cutting corners on expenses. If we work through a depression, it's going to be with worse ratios and fewer supplies, mark my words.
Nursing News