Originally posted by 3rdShiftGuy
<snip> I'm a bit frustrated that in this day people don't know the transmission. Am I wrong. Is it better to isolate her because of some bleeding on her skin?
I can understand your frustration Tweety. Not to sound lax or sloppy (I
do follow UP with everyone) my personal feelings have always been "if I'm not having sex or shooting dope with them (HIV+ persons) I don't have a whole lot to worry about".
I guess my answer to isolation depends on how able to "comply" with limiting potential transmittion the patient is.
I suppose I could see isolating the patient in a few very specific circumstances like: if they are confused and could smear blood on surfaces (there is a miniscule risk of someone touching the blood with an open wound within the very narrow time frame the virus remains alive). Or if they are agitated and could scratch someone with blood contaminated nails.
Otherwise the only reason I can see for isolation is to protect the patient from the nasty bugs that can run rampant in hospitals and then only if the would was open to air.
Nursing News