Evaluate this situation. What did I miss?
- 0Oct 31, '13 by Billy_RubenSeveral nights back I admitted a patient that had a temp of 105. Blood cultures were drawn and they were positive. The patient was put on IV vanc. They also removed his port-cath two days ago because it was infected. The patient had been plodding along doing relatively well. No more high temps, white count 12. Last night his temp shot up to 103. This occurred around 4 am. I treated the fever with Tylenol and it was down to 99 by 6 am.
The doctor was furious enough with me for not calling that he went to the nursing director. I had to explain to her my rationale for not calling which was blood cultures had already been drawn and he's been on vanc. I'm not sure what else would have been done at this point. She told me to always call the doctor in a situation like that. But this wasn't a new thing. He came in with very high fever. I feel like if I had called at 4 am the doctor would have said, "He's been on vanc and we've already done cultures. Why are you calling and waking me up with this?"
Is my like of thinking wrong? I feel like I am never for sure when to call in situations like this is the middle of the night.
Also, I forgot to mention. This am his white count had jumped from 12 to 16. However, that info wasn't available to me on my shift. Labs came in right at the tail end.
- 3,963 Views
- 6Oct 31, '13 by CP2013My first thought is that the IC Vanc might not have been effective. If patient temp was previously stable, it could be new infection or may be that the current infection is resistant to current therapies. Most facilities have parameters like "call for pt temp greater than x" and most places I have worked the temp greater than 101.5 or 102 would be reason enough to call.
- 2Oct 31, '13 by OCRN3I think your rationale for not calling was right. I don't think I would have called at 4 am either. There are doctors that have preferences and do get mad if you call or don't call. Just make sure you call this particular doctor for anything abnormal no matter what time it is from now on.
Sent from my iPhone using allnurses.com
- 2Oct 31, '13 by mluvsgncIt seems like the order would have been the answer. As cp2013 mentioned, almost every order has parameters for "a temperature greater than X" to call the physician. Then if the doctor got mad that you called him at 4am, you could state that you were following the (his) order. Also, you would give the doc your rationale for calling ("I'm concerned about sepsis" or "the infection might be resistant to the meds" etc.), which are both valid concerns.
- 1Oct 31, '13 by GrnTeaQuote from mluvsgncIt seems like the order would have been the answer. As cp2013 mentioned, almost every order has parameters for "a temperature greater than X" to call the physician. Then if the doctor got mad that you called him at 4am, you could state that you were following the (his) order. Also, you would give the doc your rationale for calling ("I'm concerned about sepsis" or "the infection might be resistant to the meds" etc.), which are both valid concerns.
You would absolutely be within your scope of practice as an RN to say this, too, and don't let him or anyone else tell you otherwise.
- 14Oct 31, '13 by amoLuciaQuote from madwife2002Without a doubt, I would have called. While all your reasons seem plausible, I would consider this a significant change of status for a pt who was otherwise showing signs of improvement/recovery. This signals a setback as something else seems to be brewing and the MD needs to be notified in a timely fashion.I would have called the Doctor re elevated temp of 103 I would be worried about sepsis and the ineffective anti-biotic
If this MD got her knickers bunched up because of the time, well then, so be it. Her problem. But when in doubt, I always try to err on the safe side. I'd have called, if nothing more than to CYA (mine).