Re: associates in nursing is pointless Originally Posted by dannyc12
You can shed the light yourself by taking a look at the percentage of working nurses whose initial degree was an ASN. After you do that, please let us know what you think.
(Hint: Around 35%)
I beg to differ. According to the HRSA report of the National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses:
"The initial educational preparation for the largest proportion of RNs is the associate degree. Forty-two percent, or 1,227,256 of the 2,909,357 RNs received their initial nursing education in an associate degree program. Similarly, in terms of the highest level of preparation for nursing, the trend from 1980 to 2004 indicates that an increasing number of RNs receive baccalaureate and master’s degrees, even if their initial preparation for nursing was an associates degree or a diploma."
Lots of RN's start with ADNs and enter the workforce. Many continue on to get higher degrees. The associate degree is still the entry level technical degree into the nursing workforce, and that's not likely to change moving forward.
Job prospects have more to do with economic factors, and job candidates than with a trend towards requiring BSNs over ADNs. As the "boomers" age into retirement, and the nursing schools continue to have difficulty attracting and retaining faculty - the role of the ADN will continue to be essential.
That being said - the baccalaureate degree should be a goal for all professional nurses - just not a hiring requirement.
Nursing News