About transgendered patients
1Sep 23, '10 by YEGRNHello all,
In addition to "working the floor" I also teach nursing, and two of my students this past week posed an excellent question. I had my (second year) students working on taking patient health histories, and the following question came up: If a nurse has a patient whom s/he suspects is transitioning from one gender to another (and the patient hasn't disclosed this information), how does one respectfully ask if a) this is indeed the case, and b) how far along is the patient in their process of transition. Additionally, when is a transgendered individual considered to be anatomically male/female? (I'm assuming that hormone therapy and surgery have been done). Finally, one more question: for transgendered individuals who have not yet made the physical transition, and even though they're using, say in this case a female name, when all of their ID is still in their birth/male names, I'm assuming that this patient would be identified for medical purposes as "male," even though he wishes to be addressed and treated like a woman (or vice-versa in the case of a woman transitioning from female to male).
Curious to know what others think!
13Sep 23, '10 by FribbletGender is cultural; sex is biological.
If a person has had sexual reassignment surgery, then they are now a transexual, and, for all intents and purposes, male or female (depending on which surgery they had).
If they are using hormones and living as the opposite gender, then they are transgendered but biologically the opposite sex and should be identified as such in the medical record. However, it is perfectly acceptable to refer to this patient as the gender they prefer.
In fact, no matter where a person is in their transition, I refer to and identify them in the manner they prefer. Some who are transitioning to a female, wish to be referred to by their chosen female name and with female pronouns. Others, when receiving medical care prefer their biological sex and given name. It depends on where they are in the transition and their own personal preference. But, when it comes to demographics, if they have not had reassignment surgery, then their biological sex is listed.
This is just my understanding and perception. Hope it was somewhat helpful!
5Sep 23, '10 by heronAs for the situation in which the person has not disclosed, I would first ask what makes the student suspect that the person is indeed transitioning?
Many folks are transgendered naturally - that is possessing characteristics of both genders at birth. Some have come to be comfortable with that and do not chose to change their physical being to fit cultural norms.
There is a website - Butch-Femme.com - that has a forum on gender theory. You may not find answers - but it might give an idea of how transgendered folk view themselves. It's a complicated subject.
Fair warning, however ... as on this site, posters there pull no punches and do not tolerate either homo- or trans-phobia. Anyone surfing there needs to pull up their grown-up pants and expect to read things they may not be used to seeing discussed in a public forum. All are welcome, but must, obviously, be respectful of the community.Last edit by heron on Sep 23, '10 : Reason: wording change
1Sep 23, '10 by flashpointTouchy situation!
I ran into a tochy sort of situation a few years ago. We had a male who was taking female hormones while awaiting surgery come to the ER with chest pain. The lab tech wasn't sure whether to put male or female when she was putting info into the EKG machine. The PA that was on told her to use male because the patent's chromosomes were male. The patient got a copy of the EKG and was VERY offended upon reading the line that said male.
You just can't win sometimes. I would think that people undergoing a gender reassignment / transition procedure would be understanding when things like that happen...people just aren't sure what the right thing to do it...and the right thing could easily vary from person to person.
7Sep 23, '10 by phoenixrnThere are two important issues: obtaining necessary and accurate information, and respecting the patient's self-identification.
From what I know of the transgendered community, there are several different ways that they refer to themselves that can be charted with relevance to medical care. Some examples of what I would write:
Transgendered male to female (MTF for short): has had the surgery, living completely as their new gender
Transistioning female to male (FTM for short): has not yet had the surgery, could be taking hormones or in any of the many stages of transistioning to a new gender.
Another point of relevance is if they are taking hormones or not. Where I work, there is community of transgendered MTFs who have kept their male genitals and are taking female hormones, living as female.
It never hurts when you introduce yourself to ask "How do you like to be called? Do you identify with a particular gender?" and this can be a leading question to more relevant questions that a nurse would need for his/her assessment.
I think it would be a GREAT assignment for nursing students to contact a local LGTB center and study the experiences that the LGBT community have had with the medical system. Let me know if any of my recommendations should be modified!!!
0Sep 23, '10 by Flying ICU RNI'm assuming that this patient would be identified for medical purposes as "male,"
I have never researched the issue, but I wonder about how far the re-definition can go from a medical perspective, as unidentified skeletal remains would always be primarily identified by gender.
5Sep 23, '10 by VivaRNI usually start out by saying, "these are questions we ask everyone" (and we do)
What was your sex at birth?
How do you identify today?
Have you, or do you wish to have reassignment surgery?
Are you on hormones? What are your goals for therapy?
Our clinic policy is not to list sex differently unless the patient has undergone surgery and is anatomically that sex. The labels read Suzie Brown, 44M, but I've never had anyone complain if I call her Suzie and she accesses women's services (for example, sees providers who see women and social workers who work with women).
This is a population that has experienced a lot of pain and judgment. A little awareness goes a long way in building trust.
It's great these students raised the issue!
3Sep 23, '10 by FlareAnother thought I didn't notice anyone touching on is room assignments. I would imagine that would make for a hairy situation if you have a biological man that identifies as a women (or vice versa). Some people may not have an issue sharing a room with a person who is outwardly one gender but in reality is the opposite, but i would imagine it would make a lot of people uncomfortable (especially if they are from an older generation) if they found out that the patient in the next bed is in the process of a gender reassignment. In this sue happy world you can bet on a lawsuit.
0Sep 23, '10 by dudette10Quote from cotjockeyI don't know the answer, but I'm wondering if it really does make a difference what the gender is identified as on EKGs, EEGs, and imaging studies. I mean, would a cardiologist, neurologist, or radiologist be looking for specific details based on what we know about anatomical differences of organs shared by both genders? Would taking hormones affect these organs in such a way that a doctor reading the studies would be assisted by knowing that the patient is a transsexual or in the process of of transgendering.I ran into a tochy sort of situation a few years ago. We had a male who was taking female hormones while awaiting surgery come to the ER with chest pain. The lab tech wasn't sure whether to put male or female when she was putting info into the EKG machine. The PA that was on told her to use male because the patent's chromosomes were male. The patient got a copy of the EKG and was VERY offended upon reading the line that said male.
If there is a medical reason for knowing this, and it was noted on studies the patient receives, it might be a good idea to let him/her know ahead of time to avoid offense.
0Sep 23, '10 by YEGRNHello everyone,
Thank you so much for your replies, all of which I thought were very respectful and well-thought out. Above all I always teach my students respect, respect, respect for your patients regardless of gender, sex, colour, ethnicity, race, age, culture, religion.
As for the question that was posed by one of the respondees re: what would make us think that an individual is transitioning from one gender to another if the individual hasn't disclosed this information, my students gave as an example a man who still possessed a number of biologically male physical characteristics, such as evidence that the individual is shaving facial hair, prominent upper body musculature, a deeper voice, a prominent Adam's apple, but who was identifying with the female gender as shown by use of cosmetics, hair style, choice of clothing, breast development. Bear in mind that I'm not saying that one should automatically assume that a male is transitioning to female just because the individual has well-defined upper body musculature ... of course not ... I'm just saying that if there were a cluster of "clues," such as the characteristics I mentioned above, I would be inclined to ask if the individual were undergoing gender and/or sex transition, and I would want to to ask in such a way that the individual would not be offended in any way.
Again, thanks to all for responding!