#1 Nursing Resource: 806,000 unique visitors per month

Log in   Sign up   Why join?   | Layout: Switch to narrow layout Color: gold style blue style rose style
Nursing Community for Nurses
Home Forums Articles Specialty Students Region Career Resources

Advanced Search Site Help Site Map

no monitor tech?



Currently Online
Members: 94
Guests: 947
1,041

Job Spotlight
Sales & Customer Service Rep
Broughton, Illinois
Forum Spotlight
Distance Learning for Nursing

Nursing Degrees

Nursing Articles

The Patient I Failed
Patients Who Have Changed My Life
Rocking Camille
"I'm Leaving You Here....."
The most beautiful curls I'd ever seen
Patients who have changed our lives
We are so lucky....
The Little Old Lady
John Doe
Remember the days before my death
Submit An Article

Nursing Jobs

Job Seeker: Employer:

Scrubs & Gear

Newsletter

Subscribe to the free allnurses.com email newsletter. We will keep you informed of nursing news, articles, discussions, and more.

Enter your email address:

Read current:
Nursing Newsletter

How-To allnurses

allnurses videos

Welcome to allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses

The largest most active online nursing community. Join 302,385 nurses from around the world to learn, communicate, and network. For full allnurses.com access, register today - it's free! Problems during registration? Please don't hesitate to contact support.

Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Aug 19, 2006, 06:32 PM
LanaBanana's Avatar
LanaBanana (Female)
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
no monitor tech?

I just started as a CNA on an Intermediate Cardiac Care unit. It is a telemetry unit but they said they recently lost the monitor tech. So my question is, if nobody is watching the monitors, then what is the purpose? There have got to be some abnormalities going on that nobody is catching. Maybe I just don't understand how it works. Can somebody explain it to me?

Top
  #2  
Old Aug 19, 2006, 06:47 PM
jmgrn65's Avatar
BSN RN
Join Date: Jun 2005
Re: no monitor tech?

how are they going to know if someone goes into a dysrthmia? They are setting themselves up for a lawsuit. someone has to watch the monitors, someone trained to read telemetry.

Top
  #3  
Old Aug 20, 2006, 02:59 PM
Dinith88 (Male)
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Re: no monitor tech?

Originally Posted by LanaBanana
Maybe I just don't understand how it works. Can somebody explain it to me?
YOu're right, you dont understand how it works. First off, if the unit is 'telemetry' the nurses will be trained to read the monitors. Second, the monitors record everything that it 'thinks' is abnormal and the nurse can review the alarms and see if anything wierd has happened (how often she looks at the monitor to review the alarms depends on the nurse..) Third, if a patient goes into an abnormal or dangerous rhythm, the monitor will bong and scream until someone shuts it up (and looks at the rhythm).

Nurses can become dependent(lazy) on monitor techs, but it is my opinion that they are a waste of money/assets. Many (most!) hospitals dont use them. Todays tele monitors are very accurate...to the point that they are usually 'over' sensitive and bong when they dont need to. Which, i suppose, is better than not being sensitive enough.

Top
  #4  
Old Aug 20, 2006, 03:07 PM
jmgrn65's Avatar
BSN RN
Join Date: Jun 2005
Re: no monitor tech?

yes but if no one is near the monitors who is going to hear the alarms bonging? If someone is astolye or VT who is going to know.

Top
  #5  
Old Aug 20, 2006, 03:19 PM
truern's Avatar
RN
Join Date: Oct 2003
Re: no monitor tech?

Goodness, on my unit we not only have a monitor tech with their own set of monitors, but we have another whole bank of monitors at the nurses' station. There's not a snowball's chance in heck that somebody won't know when there's something going on.

Top
  #6  
Old Aug 20, 2006, 06:15 PM
Dinith88 (Male)
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Re: no monitor tech?

Originally Posted by jmgrn65
yes but if no one is near the monitors who is going to hear the alarms bonging? If someone is astolye or VT who is going to know.
hmmm. Do units exist that dont have at least one person at the station all the time???

OK. I've never worked a unit where a nurse wasnt either in the station or within earshot of the 'loud' monitors.

I suppose if the unit is either so spread-out or understaffed that at times no-one is within earshot...or in the station... then i guess it'd be acceptable to pay someone to sit and stare at the monitors with the panic-phone/button. Although if a unit is THAT empty or slow, it would seem even more a drain on limited funds to have a monitor-sitter.

And did i mention that i firmly believe nurses who rely on monitor techs are less capable of reading tele/rhythms than nurses who do it themselves???

Top
  #7  
Old Aug 20, 2006, 06:20 PM
LanaBanana's Avatar
LanaBanana (Female)
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Re: no monitor tech?

I guess the problem is that our monitor station is separate from the nurses station. The area where the monitors are is also where the CNAs seem to hang out when things get slow, or to stop and sit for a minute - sitting while folding washcloths of course! But when an alarm went off on the monitors I asked one of the other aids what it was for and she said "beats me." Doesn't seem like the best set-up, but I know our unit is up for a remodel soon so they will probably incorporate the monitor area into the regular nurses station. For the time being though, I'm not sure what's going on. Maybe I'll ask one of the nurses the situation tomorrow.

Top
  #8  
Old Aug 24, 2006, 11:00 AM
CarVsTree's Avatar
CarVsTree (Female)
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Re: no monitor tech?

I work on a tele unit with no monitor techs. In fact the entire hospital (and pretty much all the hospitals in the area) no longer use monitor techs. The tele system has loud audible alarms for dysrythmias, tachy, brady, etc. There are two types of alarms. One goes beep (less worrisome). Then there's the ding ding - only goes off for dangerous arrythmias. You can still here the monitors inside pt's rooms. In addition, the tele monitor calls the beeper that the nurse is carrying which displays a message for the reason for the alarm. For example HR >100 105. So, if you have a pt. running in the 90's you can set the tachy alarm for say 110. If you have a pt who is always tachy you can set it higher. If you have a pt. with an irregular HR you can turn the irregular HR alarm off so it is not going off every 20 seconds.

So, monitor techs are not necessary as long as you have a system that will alert the RN of alarms.


Last edited by CarVsTree : Aug 24, 2006 at 11:03 AM.
Top
  #9  
Old Aug 24, 2006, 06:09 PM
vamedic4 (Male)
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Re: no monitor tech?

I'm sorry I have to completely disagree with the above post about having no monitor techs and that being a good thing. Competent techs can cut a nurses workload in half by effectively reducing their unnecessary response to alarms that are inconsequential...and we all know which one's those are.
Working in cardiology, our nurses are dependent on telemetry techs for strip interpretation and to alert them to potential problems...but to not have tele techs at all seems a very dangerous precedent to set.

Oh, and these computers aren't the most accurate on the planet, either. They frequently alarm when nothing is actually wrong, or when the patient is moving, going to the bathroom, et cetera. Our ability to ignore this leaves the RN able to do more important things...like the important patient care she's paid for.

If we have any question about a rhythm, we send someone in immediately..and they can advise us if escalation is necessary.

vamedic4
Going to orientation

Top
  #10  
Old Aug 24, 2006, 06:14 PM
Angie O'Plasty, RN's Avatar
Joule of an RN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Re: no monitor tech?

Originally Posted by vamedic4
I'm sorry I have to completely disagree with the above post about having no monitor techs and that being a good thing. Competent techs can cut a nurses workload in half by effectively reducing their unnecessary response to alarms that are inconsequential...and we all know which one's those are.
Working in cardiology, our nurses are dependent on telemetry techs for strip interpretation and to alert them to potential problems...but to not have tele techs at all seems a very dangerous precedent to set.

Oh, and these computers aren't the most accurate on the planet, either. They frequently alarm when nothing is actually wrong, or when the patient is moving, going to the bathroom, et cetera. Our ability to ignore this leaves the RN able to do more important things...like the important patient care she's paid for.

If we have any question about a rhythm, we send someone in immediately..and they can advise us if escalation is necessary.

vamedic4
Going to orientation


Top
Sponsored Links
 
Would you like to comment?
Join or Login if already a member.


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Tech Made Me So Angry, I was ready to choke the tech (rant) Marie_LPN Operating Room Nursing 22 Aug 31, 2007 08:54 PM
My favorite monitor tech would... CrazyPremed Cardiac Nursing 2 Sep 21, 2006 07:28 PM


Currently Active Users Viewing: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



New To Site?
Need Help?

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 AM.

no monitor tech?

Copyright © 1996-2008, allnurses.com. All rights reserved.  allnurses.com, Inc. Advertising Information