Originally Posted by RNn2010
I've been accepted to two ADN programs and the Master's Entry program at a well known school where we'll be trained as Clinical Nurse Leaders. I'm thinking of choosing the ADN over the Master's Entry. Am I crazy?
My reason for choosing the ADN boils down to money. I will have NO DEBT when I complete the program. Whereas with the MSN program, I could potentially be in the hole about $70K.
I understand that as a Clinical Nurse Leader I will, in theory, be promoted quicker. But, as a graduate of a CNL program, my first two years will be at the same level and salary as a graduate from an Associate's degree program.
On the surface I think I'm crazy for wanting to go the ADN route over getting the MSN. I am planning to become a Nurse Practitioner, and if I attend the CNL program, I still have to go an additional 2 years for my post-Master's certificate to become an NP.
PLEASE give me your feedback, experience, and/or opinions.
Thank you!
Personally I would get it out of the way and do the masters. If you do the ADN route will you work those additional 2 years for your post masters and your 18 months for the masters? How much will it cost you to do it the longer way around? I know that bridging from ADN to BSN is longer than just going straight through. Do all the possible scenarios, time wise and money wise before you make your decision. But it if it was me, I would do the master's route.
The following member says Thank You: